this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
284 points (97.3% liked)

World News

50301 readers
2191 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Despite platform’s limits on adult content, study finds it not only accessible but often suggested

TikTok has directed children’s accounts to pornographic content within a small number of clicks, according to a report by a campaign group.

Global Witness set up fake accounts using a 13-year-old’s birth date and turned on the video app’s “restricted mode”, which limits exposure to “sexually suggestive” content.

Researchers found TikTok suggested sexualised and explicit search terms to seven test accounts that were created on clean phones with no search history.

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 78 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Daily reminder to stop using TikTok 🤗

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

applies to most for profit social media

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 15 points 1 week ago

applies to ~~most~~ all for profit social media

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Social media is pretty unhealthy, honestly. Especially when used excessively, no matter if it's for profit or not.

[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 0 points 1 week ago

Even non-social media. Find some local newspaper that can't afford a website but cares about their readers

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago
[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I didn't look back after switching to rednote the first time Tiktok was threatened.

[–] PanGodofPanic@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wouldn't exactly put any trust in rednote either

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If they showed millions of children pornography, the CEO would probably be in prison.

As for rednote being used to amplify narratives supported by the CPC, as an American, that is preferable to any other sizable social media I have access to except discord, where the same occurs except at the behest of the US.

At least when I report nazis on xhs, they get banned.

[–] passepartout@feddit.org 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

One more lever to force age verification / personal identification of users.

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 68 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The problem is that they're being served adult content despite the site knowing they're underage, so age verification wouldn't help at all... If anything, this is a demonstration as to why age verification isn't a good solution.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

If anything, this is a demonstration as to why age verification isn't a good solution.

Won't stop surveillance state bad actors from arguing exactly the opposite, though.

[–] passepartout@feddit.org 15 points 1 week ago

You're absolutely right, but it's not like facts matter anymore in this regard.

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 34 points 1 week ago

But its ok. We are making adults provide ID so they can access adult material theyre legally allowed to access- UK government.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Are we talking like actual porn on tiktok or just women dancing in bikinis? Because one of those used to be called the MTV channel, and the other was always being accessed by teens with a few clicks.

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

The difference I suppose is deliberately looking for it vs the algorithm feeding it to them

[–] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

The search function immediately suggesting very rude videos and rude girls etc, probably softcore but weird to recommend to accounts set up as 13 year olds with age restrictions

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

Actual nudity was never allowed on tiktok. But kink is fine.

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

That’s the new MAGA feature

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

When conservatives run something, children get fucked.

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Tiktok was taken over by fanatical Zionist Larry Ellison.

[–] falseWhite@programming.dev 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There's porn on tiktok? Have I been missing out??

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Not porn. More like borderline sfw softcore. For a kid it’s more than enough though.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I can't tell if you're being facetious or not but perhaps you don't remember when the biggest "stars" on tiktok were 15 year olds dancing in bikinis....

[–] falseWhite@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

🤮🤮🤮 I have watched maybe 3 tiktok videos in my life

[–] BlackVenom@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

That's not cool but also not porn.

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago

I'm shocked! Shocked!

[–] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

When i was younger i got my kicks from the murdoch press newspapers, smh, lock those things up

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_3

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

13 year old kid: "Yea! That was what I was looking for!"

Lol speedrunning

[–] LSNLDN@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

Guardian minimises Israeli genocide while holding Russia to account as it should

[–] Bullerfar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I fucking hate tiktok. Never understood how this braincaser got allowed into the EU in the first place. Maybe I am just an old angry dumbass, but when I first started using it in my marketing team back in 2019, it just shouted cancer every post I saw. This thing should never been allowed for children. Also, read the terms of the app..

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Anyone remember when tiktok was called musically? It was basically a dispo for pedos

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago

Hentai is just Japanese cartoons, right? RIGHT???

[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I didn't think that this needed to be said, but I suppose it does.

IT IS NOT OK TO FUCK CHILDREN,PULL YOUR DICK OUT AND DO STUFF TO THEM WITH IT OR MAKE THEM DO STUFF WITH YOUR DICK. IT IS NOT OK TO LURE KIDS IN WITH THE END GOAL OF FUCKING OR MOLESTING THEM. THIS IS VERY BAD AND YOU SHOULD NEVER DO IT. RICH WHITE PEOPLE, THIS IS MAINLY FOR YOU.

There, I hope that helps.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

While I agree with your statement, that's not really what this article is about.

[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 week ago

I do tend to get off topic.