this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
88 points (98.9% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

64615 readers
226 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For reference, here is the last post I made on this matter.

I have collected data based on some YouTube channels I have managed to (mostly) archive over the year. Specifically, I started archiving at the start of March 2025. Judging by this initial data I can more confidently say that either YouTube is performing some seriously shady shit, or an extremely high number of active YouTube creators have chosen to unlist an extremely high number of their videos in the past couple months.

About my data:

  1. The column titled 'Uploaded' is the number of uploads as shown on the creator's homepage.
  2. The column titled 'Public' is the number of uploads for each creator that are currently listed as of midnight, Fri 3 Oct 2025. This is shown via yt-dlp's count for the entire channel, and the videos visible on the channel's Videos tab.
  3. While the slight difference in number may seem unsuspicious, yt-dlp gathers a count of all listed videos, whether public, private, membership only, marked as NSFW or age restricted.
  4. I can safely say, given my current archive, that the significant deindexing by creator or by YouTube must have happened to each channel within the last few months. The difference between channels whose upload count matches my archive count, but is far higher than the public count, is suspicious to me.
  5. Each creator's entire upload set is purely vlog-style with minimal edits, and are not in the habit of breaching the Community Guidelines.

The stats:

The action:

  • I am currently contacting creators who have several hundred unlisted videos for confirmation, if they were the ones to delist them.

The conclusion so far:

  • While I am suspicious of sneaky behaviour, it is also possible that every missing video was actually unlisted by the creator.
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 day ago

YouTube did make some changes to their terms primarily for creators that get paid for content. They added some new LLM-based scanning of content to find stuff that is too repetitive or didn't contain enough original content. Assuming the creators you looked at have mostly original content rather than remixing of content which may be misinterpreted by LLMs as not being "original enough", they could be falling victim to overaggressive hits if they use a consistent format in their content since LLMs don't really understand context, only patterns.

I'd be interested to find out if the creators got any notification from YouTube on the reason for removal of the content.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

might it have something to do with this?

https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/14328491?hl=en&co=GENIE.Platform%3DAndroid

i have already seen some "synthetic content" labels attached to random videos

[–] Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wouldn't have thought so, as none of these creators in my first test have used these methods for editing - their content is all vlog style, with the only edits involving audio effects and cuts between footage. I'm ruling nothing out until it's proven irrelevant, however.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

what i have seen it on so far was pure slop, some random images from photobank, sometimes even with the watermark, accompanied by generated voice, so these are the ones that should really go.

[–] Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's good to know that those are being acted on, but hell. AI should be a tool, not a replacement. Maybe companies will figure that out someday