this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
379 points (97.7% liked)

Mildly Interesting

22775 readers
149 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] elena@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago

As a mother of an actual human I gotta say $1,500 for a lifetime is a ridiculous figure that wouldn’t even last a week when covering basic necessities (stroller, bedding, diapers, lotion, etc.)

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

I had no idea the only thing keeping me from escaping poverty is rent for a month

[–] napkin2020@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Plus $500/month for a year. It's to help with diapers, food, etc. it's a start, but needs a lot more if they don't want the population to drop off the Mariana trench.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

My copay on each of my kids births was over $2k, one was $7k. A couple of those bills were close to $30k, not that we paid that much, but still.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

The US: “we need to be making more babies! Also fuck you, here’s a bill for the amount of a very nice new car! Get fucked, loser!”

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 22 points 1 day ago

This is normal in all the developed countries.

Having and raising children is not a concern only for the mother, the whole community needs to be involved.

[–] SalamenceFury@lemmy.world 112 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (11 children)

How many studies that boil down to giving people money with no strings attached that always result in "well it improves their lives it seems" are we gonna have before people finally decide it's worth doing that stuff universally?

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

For some, life has to be suffering. I think that people can't get past that way of thinking.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 41 points 2 days ago

The trouble is, the people doing the studies and the people in charge of deciding where public money is spent and acquired, are different groups.

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Even Milton Friedman, the Nobel winning economist credited for libertarianism and neoliberal economics was in favour of UBI.

He specifically advocated for simplifying the tax code, and abolishing the welfare state in favour of progressive tax rates which included a negative income tax, which is a more extreme UBI.

Right wing policy makers just heard the simplify tax code and abolish welfare state part.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Many people are driven by feelings. We all are to some extent. But for many people feelings are primary. This comes up all the time.

You can show charts and studies and everything, but they don't care. You have to make them feel good about it.

Frankly I'm kind of sick of pandering to overgrown toddlers, but there's no escape from it.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

i mean this is true but also the natural state of humans isn't to be filled with hatred, if it was just that people are ruled by emotion then the world would be an amazing place since most people have empathy.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 1 points 15 hours ago

It's the combination of "all feelings no thinkings" and "in-group good, out-group bad" that's really the problem.

Just one or the other isn't a disaster.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 58 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Multiply that figure by at least 10, and it might actually be meaningful.

EDIT: Ah, there's a continuing payment aspect to it.

Well, that's actually fairly impactful then.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 74 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (12 children)

$1500, once

$500/month for the first 12 months

That helps, but that's a far cry from "born into poverty" solutions

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For people on the edge, this would make all the difference in the world and allow them to sleep at night.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

For sure. I'm all for it.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago

Still amazing and I'm sure incredibly helpful to the families.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] kadup@lemmy.world 84 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The entire point of living in a society, of following the collective social contract, is to assure everybody's basic needs are met.

To suggest otherwise is contradictory to the very core of what a society is, and at that point, its better to have no society at all.

Given how having "no society at all" is impossible with 8 billion of us around... Either provide for everybody's basic needs, or people need to break the social contract until they enforce their needs are met.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 18 points 2 days ago

Being egoistic and wanting society to pitch in at the same time is a core tenet of the US republican party. Privatise the gains, socialise the losses is a big thing there. There are millions of people like that and unfortunately they are influencing the world-wide discourse on the issue.

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Cool that they took the lead on this

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

I see what you did there.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 15 points 2 days ago (7 children)

In Germany you get 250€ every month per child until they are 18. Even after, if they remain in education. If they move out they can get it directly for themselves.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›