this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
522 points (97.8% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

8243 readers
400 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Matrix

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The mod banning these users is the same mod who made the posts they downvoted. This is mod abuse, turning the downvote button into an auto-self-ban button.

The message is "If you disagree with me, you will be banned"

Monitoring and banning users for using lemmy as intended to signal boost your opinion should be grounds to have all mod privileges removed. This behaviour undermines the integrity of the server and the wider fediverse.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 15 hours ago

Ngl seems like a boring community

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago

90% of my downvotes are unintentional. The other 10% are for people who use alternating case. I have half a mind to go downvote everything in this boring company community though, just for laughs.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 40 points 1 day ago

I hope that dipshit is reading this thread. Ban me, too!

Yeee, I’m in this pic and I like it! Good job me 🫶

[–] halfapage@lemmy.world 80 points 1 day ago (2 children)

mods are fascinating specimen, no matter the platform

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

People with a very high sense of responsability towards others generally avoid taking on responsabilities were their own mistakes might cause problems to others - for them such positions are a "weight on their shoulders".

People who seek power, on the other hand, generally tend to do it because of perceived social prestige or what they can do with that power. The less they feel that sense of responsabiliy to offset such attractive elements in having power the more they want power.

This is a well known phenomenon: for example there are tons of sayings about how (political) power should be given to those who do not want it not those who want it, and there's actually a Harvard Business Review article from over a decade ago about how they investigated this in companies and found that companies where the CEO unexpectedly got the position rather than seek it, in average outperformed the rest of their industry.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Power hungry people seeking validation without real-world obligations.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Not all mods are like that, of course. My instance admins had to ask me like three times to be a moderator for one of their communities because I refused them multiple times. I only said yes because it was an unmoderated/undermoderated (at the time), low traffic community, and felt bad that I had refused so many times.

I used to be a forum admin for a gaming/programming forum with what I would say is high traffic (1000+ active concurrent users daily), and moderating that felt like a full-time job, and I had appointed like 10 other moderators to help. I don't have time for that no more lol.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

That's what I mean though, terminally online mods ruin it for a lot of us. No way in hell do I have an hour or more a day to commit to policing others, yet there are mods on all social media that love to do it for free. When it's free you get a selection bias for motive. Not dissimilar to real world police.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ileftreddit@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 147 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We don't need Reddit's power tripping back

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 60 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Do you really expect the platform that lets anybody form their personal power tripping fiefdom to inexplicably not draw those people in? No centralization doesn't mean you're free of the particular flavor of power tripping you experienced, it means there are many cells of various levels of power tripping with little to no oversight.

My hope for the Fediverse is, sure. We can just allow people to be sad little kings of their sad little hills. If it's enough of a problem, everyone else can go to some other community, possibly on some other instance.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 116 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That mod is also literally the only active user in that group. Your post is the most attention it's ever got.

[–] Coupable@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago (22 children)

And this is the second time in just over a day that I've seen moderators abusing the ability to monitor how people vote.

This behaviour undermines good faith participation. Users should not be afraid of copping bans for using the downvote button as they feel is appropriate.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What do you expect from the mod of a grifting comm?

You can't hang out in a shithole without getting a little shitty.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Many mods are completely powerless in their lives. Its why the become mods. To feel like they have some control over their lives. They don't. Just like the rest of us. The difference being they are mods and can push their pathetically limited power around. Just like some asshole on the highway who slows down when you can't pass and goes to warp when you can.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 67 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Rule #0.0
Don't hurt moddy-woddy's fee-fees.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago

I made the list!

I upvote most of threelonmusketeers' posts (voyager confirms my votes are net +44) , but my down vote finger gets itchy when I see a string of pro Elmo content.

Not sure about that specific case.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›