this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
339 points (98.0% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

8240 readers
569 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Matrix

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The mod banning these users is the same mod who made the posts they downvoted. This is mod abuse, turning the downvote button into an auto-self-ban button.

The message is "If you disagree with me, you will be banned"

Monitoring and banning users for using lemmy as intended to signal boost your opinion should be grounds to have all mod privileges removed. This behaviour undermines the integrity of the server and the wider fediverse.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bonus@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (9 children)

How do they even know you downvoted? I was banned from a carnivore's communities once and can't say I'd ever even seen them. Claimed I was committing "systemic downvoting." Even if I had, how would they know? I started some tiny little communities on another instance, just to learn really, ~~and I have no such privied data available to me as a mod (at least not that I know of so far)~~. I should have posted that weirdo.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 31 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Many mods are completely powerless in their lives. Its why the become mods. To feel like they have some control over their lives. They don't. Just like the rest of us. The difference being they are mods and can push their pathetically limited power around. Just like some asshole on the highway who slows down when you can't pass and goes to warp when you can.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] halfapage@lemmy.world 54 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

mods are fascinating specimen, no matter the platform

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

People with a very high sense of responsability towards others generally avoid taking on responsabilities were their own mistakes might cause problems to others - for them such positions are a "weight on their shoulders".

People who seek power, on the other hand, generally tend to do it because of perceived social prestige or what they can do with that power. The less they feel that sense of responsabiliy to offset such attractive elements in having power the more they want power.

This is a well known phenomenon: for example there are tons of sayings about how (political) power should be given to those who do not want it not those who want it, and there's actually a Harvard Business Review article from over a decade ago about how they investigated this in companies and found that companies where the CEO unexpectedly got the position rather than seek it, in average outperformed the rest of their industry.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 119 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

We don't need Reddit's power tripping back

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 48 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Do you really expect the platform that lets anybody form their personal power tripping fiefdom to inexplicably not draw those people in? No centralization doesn't mean you're free of the particular flavor of power tripping you experienced, it means there are many cells of various levels of power tripping with little to no oversight.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 6 points 9 hours ago

The federative structure of the fediverse means that your average community moderator is way more accountable than a subreddit moderator is on reddit, to be fair.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 98 points 17 hours ago (20 children)

That mod is also literally the only active user in that group. Your post is the most attention it's ever got.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›