this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
649 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

74994 readers
2933 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For months, Google has maintained that the web is “thriving,” AI isn’t tanking traffic, and its search engine is sending people to a wider variety of websites than ever. But in a court filing from last week, Google admitted that “the open web is already in rapid decline” (with regard to advertising, kinda-sorta)

(page 3) 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shutz@lemmy.ca 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They admitted, with obvious glee

[–] artifex@piefed.social 24 points 2 days ago

You can tell they’re scared of it because they immediately tried to retract/clarify the statement.

Though IDK why they’d care this point since the Supreme Court already declared Google a monopoly and turned around and said they weren’t abusive enough and gave them no punishment.

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

More like Google/Alphabet is doing what it can to close up the net, and hopes that openness on the net goes into decline.

They already squeezed the open net for all its worth.

[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 2 days ago

That's a weird way to spell "celebrates".

[–] lanky_ginger@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

Fucking corporate double-speak...

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 2 days ago

They denied it until the instant doing so was inconvenient to them.

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Bye bye internet. Hello splinternet.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Essentially.

The fediverse, small-web, ubb-boards, xda, and parts of the darkweb, as well as places like 4chan all belong to a sort-of bound community.

Facebook, Google, Tiktok, Instagram etc make up the mainsteam internet with Tumblr and Reddit on the sidelines.

It's getting worse, it even trickles down to software choices and piracy. Choose Linux and trust the community, run Kodi and fight constant update breakage on Youtube and corporate streaming solutions when Jellyfin and samba shares just work?

At what point does their world of influence become seemingly worse than ours by default and everyone just ignores them? Will the giants allow themselves to be ignored? I believe they will eventually make self-sufficiency impossible. Somehow, some day, you won't have any of these choices and everyone will be nickle and dimed to death until the entire internet is an unskippable full-screen ad.

From some mobile-only average working Joes out there, that's all it already is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago

Google concern trolls the open web

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ok, well our backup is safe yeah ? So, good, it should burn down to the fucking ground,
Topple DNS tyranny, blow up the CDNs, let datacenters become dilapidated, let the 101 rooms go unstaffed

After the fire maybe something not quite as malevolent will grow in the ashes

[–] artifex@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well at least there’s the fediverse, onion routing, nostr ID management, simplex and others. It’s not quite a Plan B, and definitely takes some effort, but is much much better than nothing.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I tried TOR earlier this year, and the 3 minute pageloads that timeout 3/4 of the time, were very off putting.
I hope we can do better

[–] artifex@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like the Internet in the 90s.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nah, I had a 14400 bauds modem and even then it was never this slow
I went to the dread forum and maybe got 4 page loads in 15 minutes
simply unusable unless you really really need it and already know exactly what you need, where it is, and how to click as few links as possible to get there. And even then, reading single threads is an hours long task.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 10 points 2 days ago

“…Muahahaha!” they continued…

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›