this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
574 points (99.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3286 readers
1132 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes.

Post news related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On Monday, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to use racial profiling in its militarized immigration raids across Los Angeles, halting an injunction that had barred officers from targeting Latinos based on ethnicity. The court did not explain the reason for its shadow docket order, which appeared to split 6–3 along ideological lines. In dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor warned that the decision was “unconscionably irreconcilable with our nation’s constitutional guarantees,” opening the door to violent persecution of Latinos—including American citizens—by “masked agents with guns.” The majority did not respond to this extraordinary charge, perhaps because it is so obviously true.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 3 points 37 minutes ago

Absolutely zero sympathy for the Latinos who drank the fucking Orange Kool-Aid and support Krasnov. None and I hope those dip shits get a taste of ICE.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

I saw this coming. The SCOTUS is already compromised.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 37 points 10 hours ago

It starts with Latinos, it won't end there.

Thanks there Latino's for Trump.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

The court did not explain the reason for its shadow docket order

Cool that they can just do this.

[–] missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 hours ago

Kavanaugh did, in a concurrence. I strongly disagree with his Opinion but at least he put words to paper. the others didn't, so I assume the conservatives are fighting about the legal basis for their ruling.

they will have to eventually explain themselves at least, once this case makes it to the regular docket.

[–] philosloppy@lemmy.world 18 points 7 hours ago

yeah, it turns out unelected, lifetime appointees with the power to interpret the law with no oversight was a bad idea.

[–] aquafunk@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 9 hours ago

If they don't have to explain themselves, then they shouldn't expect one when the angry mob shows up at their door 🤷

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 20 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It's up to armed communities to now protect ourselves from the federal government.

Buy guns before they start blocking access.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 9 points 5 hours ago

Become ungovernable

[–] guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 11 hours ago

At least no Latinos voted for Trump, right? Right?

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 24 points 12 hours ago

Sound like Americans need to start detaining the supreme court

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 7 points 10 hours ago

If this shitcircus was only affecting the US i wouldn't care, but it's not.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 27 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

As a brown person. Yeah this is not new, America’s mask is just off now.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

What, you think people weren't just bidding on George Zimmerman's paintings for his artistic capacity? Incidentally, someone who would have been prime illegal ICE detainment material had he not signaled as he did to the MAGA crowd. I imagine he's their "one good Hispanic".

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 32 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

As an outsider I'm genuinely shocked. So much for the melting pot. :(

The fact that the conservatives didn't bother to explain their reasoning is entirely damning.

[–] ReallyAngryNerd@europe.pub 12 points 11 hours ago

Nazis gonna nazi.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago

"Because we can."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›