this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
345 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

74924 readers
3155 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's ok. Consumers will take up the slack on climate change. You'll just not be able to do anything ever or eat normal food. I know a lot of you say that if you don't eat meat it produces a lot less carbon.

But what if I did eat meat and google didn't spend the energy grid's entire power supply chasing dominance in a technology none of want that badly.

This is the classic example of rent seeking. Rent seeking is when resources are spent on a contest that doesn't actually produce anything for the public. And the total resources spent on the contest by all parties can exceed even the benefit to the victor. It's Mr. Beast but instead of people exhausting themselves it's corporations exhausting the planet.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 42 points 3 days ago

It was all for show from the start.

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Governments need to regulate businesses for pollution.

Politicians don't want to hinder the businesses in their country compared to abroad. They also may receives "gifts" from time to time.

Nobody regulates pollution.

Profit ?

And yet many people will still vote in some politician that probably was saying they would regulate and fight against climate change*

  • America is an exception : they elect directly someone that destroys climate for money. It's more straightforward apparently.
[–] humanoidchaos@lemmy.cif.su 25 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Consumers will take up the slack on climate change.

That would involve killing our rulers and the conpeople we keep electing.

It's the only way anything will change.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

The same bullshit as telling people to limit their showers to save water during a drought instead of having agriculture switch to crops that need less water. Because the people using 15% of the water are definitely going to make a dent when the other 85% don't give a shit.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I can think of two other ways.

  1. nuclear world war
  2. meteor takes out the planet
[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I'd love for either to happen at this point.

[–] furzegulo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

D~~on't~~efinitely be evil

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] candy_colors@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

"How to write a negative character arc?"✍️

Google existing:

[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] NotKyloRen@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

"Well don't look at me like I'm frickin' Frankenstein or something. Give your father a hug."

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

We are so fucking fucked.

[–] Ron@zegheteens.nl 4 points 3 days ago

Google started as the always ad free search engine.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Once Cheeto-head got in charge again, nearly all those tech corpos took off the blinders and go off doing anything as they please.