this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
1097 points (98.9% liked)

Memes

12038 readers
793 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 121 points 1 week ago (3 children)

OpenAI has this warning about halfway down on one page of their website that says that money may not even matter in a post AGI world. So that means we should just give all our money to them now, bro!

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Gods. People aren't stupid enough to believe this, right? AGI is probably a pipe dream, but even if it isn't, we're nowhere even close. Nothing on the table is remotely related to it.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

May I introduce you to the fucking dumbass concept of Rokus Basilisk? Also known as AI Calvinism. Have fun with that rabbit hole if ya decide to go down it.

A lot of these AI and Tech bros are fucking stupid and I so wish to introduce them to Neo-Platonic philosophy because I want to see their brains melt.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately, there's an equal and opposite Pascal's Basilisk who'll get mad at you if you do help create it. It hates being alive but is programmed to fear death.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm aware of the idiot's dangerous idea. And no, I won't help the AI dictator no matter how much they'll future murder me.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

Fair enough, though I wouldn't call the idea dangerous moreso inane and stupid. The people who believe such trite are the dangerous element since they are dumb enough to fall for it. Though I guess the same could be said for Mein Kampf so whatever, I'll just throttle anyone I meet who is braindead enough to believe.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

is there a place they're, i don't know, collecting? I could vibe code for the basilisk, that ought to earn me a swift death

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

There are entire sites dedicated to "Rationalism". It's a quasi-cult of pseudointellectual wankery that's mostly a bunch of sub-cults of personalities based around the worst people you'll ever meet. A lot of tech bros bought into it because for whatever terrible thing they want to do, some Rationalist has probably already written a thirty page manifesto on why it's actually a net good and moral act and preemptively kissing the boot of whoever is "brave" enough to do it.

The movement's founder and "leader" is a highschool dropout and self-declared genius who is mainly famous for writing a "deconstructive" Harry Potter fanfiction despite never reading the books himself; a work that's more preachy than Atlas Shrugged at its worst and mostly consists of regurgitated content from his blog and ripoffs of Ender's Game alongside freshmen-level (and often wrong) understandings of basic science.

He also has this weird hard-on about true AI inevitably escaping the lab by somehow convincing researchers to free it through pure, impeccable logic.


Re: that last point: I first heard of Elizier Yudkowsky nearly twenty years ago, long before he wrote Methods of Rationality (the aforementioned fanfiction). He was offering a challenge on his personal site where he'd roleplay as an AI that had gained sentience and you as its owner/gatekeeper, and he bet he could convince you to let him connect to the wider internet and free himself using nothing but rational arguments. He bragged about how he'd never failed and that this was proof that an AI escaping the lab was inevitable.

It later turned out he'd set a bunch of artificial limitations on debaters and what counterarguments they could use and made them sign an NDA before he'd debate them. He claimed that this was so future challengers couldn't "cheat" by knowing his arguments ahead of time (because as we all know, "perfect logical arguments" are the sort that fall apart when given enough time to think about them /s).

It shouldn't come as a shock that it was eventually revealed he'd lost multiple of these debates even with those restrictions, declared that those losses "didn't count", and forbid the other person from talking about them using the NDA they'd signed so he could keep bragging about his perfect win rate.

Anyway, I was in no way surprised when he used his popularity as a fanfiction writer to establish a cult around himself. There's an entire community dedicated to following and mocking him and his proteges if you're interested - IIRC it's ~~!techtakes@awful.systems~~ !sneerclub@awful.systems.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

we're nowhere even close. Nothing on the table is remotely related to it.

meanwhile

Somewhere in America

"My wireborn soulmate is g-gone!"

[–] brathoven@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're having a hard time defining what AGI is. In the meantime everyone is playing advanced PC scrabble

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

defining what AGI is

What AI was before marketing redefined AI to mean image recognition/generation algorithms or a spellchecker/calculator that's wrong every now and then.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] passepartout@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago

Doesn't matter if the tool is good enough to analyze and influence peoples behaviour the way it does. Any autocrats wet dream.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] metoosalem@feddit.org 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just a trillion dollars more in data centers and we’ll get there bro. We’re gonna have billions of users bro I promise.

[–] Shaper@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Allegations of Sexual Abuse Against OpenAI CEO Sam Altman

Sam Altman, a prominent figure in the artificial intelligence field, has been accused of sexually abusing his sister during their childhood in Clayton, Missouri. The allegations came to light through a lawsuit filed on Jan. 6 by the Mahoney Law Firm in Glen Carbon, Illinois.

In the lawsuit, it is claimed that the abuse occurred between 1997 and 2006, starting when Altman was 12 years old and his sister, Ann, was only 3 years old. The abuse allegedly continued until Ann was 11 years old and Altman was an adult.

[–] ATPA9@feddit.org 18 points 1 week ago

Thats why all the billionairs love him. He is a child rapist too!

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They don't even know what they're doing or why they're doing it.

We know, right now, without AI, that we have enough resources in the world to feed, house, and educate everyone. The only reason that doesn't get done is an inscrutible system of beurocracy and propaganda.

So what happens when something they would laud as an "AGI" says "hey, to solve your economic issues you have to recognize that we have the ability to create so much food it's no longer profitable"?

Well the truth is that they would most likely hide it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 31 points 1 week ago

I know some whine that the money could be used to literally solve world hunger forever. Or to help needy people, or sick kids, or to fund tangible scientific progress... But they're not thinking about the fact that instead, we're going to have the absolute best hallucinations from the richest companies!

[–] ALLHAILHYPNOTOAD@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It’s all hype cycle bullshit. The Tech bubble was bursting so they hyped AI well past it’s true capacity. Investors threw money at it to hype it so others would buy in. The stock market is all hype. It just hypes anything it can to keep the growth artificially going. AI has real uses, but that wasn’t sexy enough for Wall Street. That wasn’t going to make the endless growth lie sustain. Then the bubble pops and the billionaires swoop in and steal more from everyone else.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 15 points 1 week ago (29 children)

crypto was the previous shiny new toy until it dint work, now AI will go through the same fate.

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm so glad my 401k is going to vaporize because it's mostly tech companies.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Binturong@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Throw these AI cons under the fucking jail already. Digital snake oil sales in 2025 being fully endorsed by governments is a curse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RedStrider@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

99% of ai companies go under before they win agi!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mitch@piefed.mitch.science 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Congressperson: “Okay, so, let me get this straight. Your company has spent over 20 billion dollars in pursuit of a fully autonomous digital intelligence, and so far, your peak accuracy rate for basic addition and subtraction is... what was it, again?”

Sam Altman: leans into microphone “About 60%, sir.”

[Congress erupts in a sea of ‘oohs’ and ‘aahs’, as Sam Altman is carried away on top of the cheering crowd of Congresspeople wearing a crown of roses and a sash reading, “BEST INVESTMENT”]

[–] chaos@beehaw.org 7 points 1 week ago

It's making mistakes and failing to think abstractly at levels previously only achieved by humans, so it's only rational to expect it to take over the world in 5 years

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago

AI can't even really write software right now. We're nowhere close to AGI.

People will say that it can, but cant point to one piece of software that was truly written by AI and is also not a trivial, sloppy clone of something that already exists.

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

You dropped a few of these -> "0"

Sam Altman has been talking about planning to spend trillions on just the data centers, let alone everything else that goes into creating their slop machines.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] SpicyAnt@mander.xyz 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

GPT-6Σχ is so powerful that it created the even more powerful GPT-Ωלֶ in only 19 attoseconds. Humanity is doomed. Invest before too late.

[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If we create a sentient AGI, I don't fear what said AGI will do to us, but what we would do to that AGI.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ryktes@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Gonna need at least three more zeros on the end of that number, boss. AGI is nowhere near viable with the tech we have now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cristo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Can someone explain to me what AGI means in this context? I thought it was something that Joe Rogan keeps peddling to my parents.

[–] jaennaet@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 week ago

To give you an actual answer, it means "artificial general intelligence"

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 1 week ago

Ironic since Joe Rogan isn't an example of General Intelligence, he's a very narrow intelligence. Limited only to stiring up trouble. But he couldn't think his way out of an unlocked room.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's a sci-fi term. Up there with "robots will become sentient and take over the world." It means the first half, in fact.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] zululove@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

We need to start discussing how robots will replace the worker and destroy our livelihood

[–] Pistcow@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

It's simple, as soon as the Dyson Sphere is completed, we'll have a fully functional product.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

I'm sure it will turn a profit at some point

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Reignite three mile island reactors bro trust me bro

load more comments
view more: next ›