this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
196 points (93.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

63791 readers
1283 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

sorry for butchering the article title, I've edited my post to try and reflect the intention of article

(page 2) 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

In a very general sense it is, the ads should pay for the content. But fuck them because even paid services add ads. And paying for Internet access, you can't tell me what I can and can't block. Good luck proving people are blocking ads at the DNS level.

[–] Torx@social.tchncs.de 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

@sad_detective_man Nah, come on — Springer is claiming that a website is a computer program.

But that's not quite accurate.

HTML and CSS aren't computer programs - they're markup/style sheet languages. They define structure and appearance but don’t perform computation or logic. JavaScript, is a programming language and can make a website behave like a program. The same goes for server-side technologies like PHP.

However, what Adblockers typically do is prevent certain resources from loading. They don't modify the underlying program logic itself - they're just manipulating the DOM or blocking elements before they render. So in many cases, we're not interfering with a "program" in the traditional sense, but rather adjusting the output or content that gets displayed.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

they're just manipulating the DOM

Imagine trying to explain that in court. Yes, your honour, it's a sort of object-based model representing the document. No, it's not really a model of an object exactly. Yes, it's made of bits and bytes, the same kind as you would use in a computer program, but it has that in common with... no, it does not actually object to anything...

[–] gravitywell@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And the rest of the world ruled that piracy is officially cool again.

always was 😎

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

axel springer: does our content suck? no, no... it's the kids who are wrong

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

And so is closing your eyes or getting up to go to the toilet.

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

Read in German

Jarrrr

Hah! Aaahahah, fuck you, German Court!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›