this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
326 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

75272 readers
3927 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I don't work in IT, but I do know you need creativity to work in the industry, something which the current LLM/AI doesn't possess.

Linguists also dismiss LLMs in similar vein because LLMs can't grasp context. It is always funny to be sarcastic and ironic on an LLM.

Soft skills and culture are what that the current iteration of LLMs lack. However, I do think there is still huge potential for AI development in dacades to come, but I want this AI bubble to burst as "in your face" to companies.

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The idea of the mental model CAN be done by AI.

In my experience, if you get it to build a requirements doc first, then ask it to implement that while updating it as required (effectively it's mental state). you will get a pretty good output with decent 'debugging' ability.

This even works ok with the older 'dumber' models.

That only works when you have a comprehensive set of requirements available though. It works when you want to add a new screen/process (mostly) but good luck updating an existing one! (I haven't tried getting it to convert existing code to a requirements doc - anyone tried that?)

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›