this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
680 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2103 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 170 points 9 months ago (6 children)

What happens to the rapist, then? Can he get partial custody of the child? Can he use that as an excuse to keep meeting or at least indirectly interacting with his rape victim?

What a great healing agent, to force women to be repeatedly reminded of that time when they were raped.

[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 96 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is just a step to eliminating rape as a crime, they'll find some way to justify as "for the babies", the GOP are completely garbage people.

[–] ringwraithfish@startrek.website 33 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] massacre@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Drusas@kbin.social 41 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Generally yes. They can even get partial custody.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 16 points 9 months ago

It's for the healing process /s

[–] wicked@programming.dev 20 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Don't worry, the good bible has the answer.

28 If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered,
29 he shall pay her father fifty shekels of silver. He must marry the young woman, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 116 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well Missouri is the 'legitimate rape' state so...yep. This is on brand.

[–] spider@lemmy.nz 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

from 2021:

Ex-US Rep. Todd Akin, sunk by 'legitimate rape' remark, dies

"He was a devout Christian..."

surprise! /s

[–] AquaTofana@lemmy.world 113 points 9 months ago (1 children)

From the article: "Also in 2022, a Michigan Republican candidate said he told his daughters “If rape is inevitable, you should just lie back and enjoy it.”

I do not think I've ever read a statement from someone that has pissed me off so fucking quickly. Someone needs to check on this man's daughters and fucking take them from him, forcibly if necessary, ASAP, and then put them with a family who legitimately loves them.

FUCK I HATE THIS TIMELINE.

[–] Ekybio@lemmy.world 40 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Dont hate the timeline.

Hate Republicans. Thats just more honest.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 82 points 9 months ago (5 children)

I would make this guy walk around with a cantaloupe in his ass for 9 months and then shit it out, take it home a day later, and send him a bill for $10k a week later.

[–] doubletwist@lemmy.world 42 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And then make him take care of it for 18 years.

[–] Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 9 months ago

And charge him 12k a year that whole time

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works 70 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Holy fuck, this should be cause for mandatory public castration.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

You don't want to do these fuck-knuckles any harm, you just want to give them opportunities for great healing events of their own.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 62 points 9 months ago (6 children)

This dude looks like he has some kind of ulterior motive, here.

What i am saying is: he looks like a rapist.

[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago

Yeah, it looks like he wants to rape women and force them to have his rape babies. I'm guessing he's already raped somebody, based on this pro-rapist attitude.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Norgur@kbin.social 57 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I literally feel ill. Like physically ill. My wife blessed me with my baby boy and imagining that someone could force her to go what she went through to get him into this world is... IDK what it is... Too angry rn. Fucking disgusting fuckfaces!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 55 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Rape babies can be dropped off at his front door.

[–] ClopClopMcFuckwad@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Rape Babies, the next great band name.

[–] Ragdoll_X@lemmy.world 31 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Rape Babies (Noun) ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Rape Babies (Verb)

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 52 points 9 months ago

Of course the members of the pedophilia party would say that having a rapist's baby would be beneficial to the rape victim.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 42 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

We are seemingly moments away from women being prosecuted for giving men erections.

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago

Please don't give them anymore ideas

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] VioletRing@kbin.social 40 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It seems more honest than touting exceptions as some sort of compromise. Have you ever thought of what a rape exception (or other exceptions) looks like in practice? They just don't happen. How many abortion providers are willing to test the law? How many pregnant people are able to get a police report necessary to be exempted? How many abortion providers are even practicing in states with rape exceptions to their otherwise strict abortion laws?

Arguing about what exceptions should or should not be on the books is a distraction. It's only service is to placate the general public into accepting barbaric abortion bans.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/01/21/us/abortion-ban-exceptions.html

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 36 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Cool. Let's see a baby try to force its way out of him.

[–] x4740N@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

I wish we had technology that could do that so this fucker gets to experience that

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

.... Like a xenomorph baby?

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

Not what I had in mind but ...I like it! It's a plan!

[–] doubletwist@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago

This fuck-knuckle has 5 kids. If any of them are girls, I'd bet good money he wants this because he wants to be sure they can't have an abortion when he knocks one (or more) of them up, as part of his Handmaid's Tale fantasy.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)
[–] flicker@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Did you just make me, for half a second, support the serial gang rape of Senators who support this legislation?

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I support the serial gang rape of Senators who support this legislation in perpetuity. If they're going to support this shit, they should walk a few hundred miles in their victims' shoes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Like.....what the fuck is going on right now?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 40 points 9 months ago

Right-wing Christian attitudes are being openly expressed.

[–] TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

We are reaping the rewards of "respecting religious beliefs".

I would absolutely abolish the goddamn psychos.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 31 points 9 months ago

republicans love rape

[–] Smeagol666@lemm.ee 29 points 9 months ago

Why the fuck are repulitards like cartoon villains except without the humor?

[–] Caaaaarrrrlll@lemmy.ml 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Missouri really is misery.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 21 points 9 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago (3 children)

What is this garbage talk about God controlling whether a woman gets pregnant or not? It's a biological function, if the egg is there when the sperm is there, you get babies. It is not some holy blessed event -- God causing babies is about as sensible as the stork bringing them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] x4740N@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

This fucker deserves to be reincarnated as a women in medieval time and have a forced birth so he can experience what he puts women through

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 18 points 9 months ago

You first, asshole.

[–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (2 children)

These people should get intragastric balloon shoved up their ass and inflated so they can feel some of the "greatest healing" first hand. It should be done against their will as well since they claim it's not an issue. You know, not to be left out of the whole greatness. Not quite fair that only females get to experience it.

If anyone complains how "god didn't meant for balloons to be in our assholes", just make a counter argument: if that were true why did it make us fart then. Clearly air is suppose to be there.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›