this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
780 points (99.4% liked)

Selfhosted

50026 readers
481 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I made a video about copyparty, the selfhosted fileserver I've been making for the past 5 years.

The main focus of the video is the features, but it also touches upon configuration. Was hoping it would be easier to follow than the readme on github... not sure how well that went, but hey :D

This video is also available to watch on the copyparty demo server, as a high-quality AV1 file and a lower-quality h264.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] piranhaconda@mander.xyz 3 points 6 days ago

Ok this is too damn cool. Will be checking it out soon, but moving to a new apartment this week so I probably shouldn't dive into new distractions just yet...

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 3 points 6 days ago

OMG I just posted this to lemmy and saw it had already been posted. Great work! Amazing video!!

nice project! I'll check it out! I've also really enjoyed your replies here. it's obvious you really know your stuff. thanks!

[–] TedZanzibar@feddit.uk 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

This is very impressive and I'm highly likely to give it a whirl. My question is, though: would it be something that my very non-tech savvy wife could use?

Eg. I'm thinking setup the app on her phone with a default location and when she asks me for a file I can just tell her that I've "put it in the app", and she'll be able to easily retrieve it. Also same thing but vice versa, though the video seems to cover that via the Android share menu...

Again, super impressive. Good job!

load more comments (2 replies)

this looks amazing! (from the youtube video. also the controls/features seem to be well thought-through) i'll give it a shot tomorrow

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Wo wo wow, is that my man JC Denton ??

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

"There are two editors in case you hate one of them"

You crack me up !!!

[–] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 days ago
[–] twikz@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 days ago

Now it would be interesting to setup a raspberry pi with harddrives plugged in the USB 3 ports💡

[–] disobey2623@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I looked at the comparison for Seafile as that's the one I'm most familiar with. In my opinion Seafile's greatest strength is its encryption, but in your comparison you seem to see this as a negative as I assume this bullet refers to the encryption? "isolated on-disk file hierarchy, incompatible with other software. much worse than nextcloud in that regard"

[–] tripflag@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

the intention with that statement was that seafile, by default, places all the files inside its own proprietary file container thing, where the files are not easily accessible from the server's actual filesystem, using regular linux utilities. My knowledge of seafile is really minimal, so this could be wrong -- in which case I'll fix that right away! or, at the very least, try to clarify what I meant to avoid this confusion.

in case you happen to know -- are you aware if it's possible to use Seafile while having it just place all the files and folders on the disk like any other program would?

[–] Andres4NY@social.ridetrans.it 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

@tripflag @disobey2623 Your statement is correct; the way seafile stores files is in blocks (for de-duplication, apparently).

They offer a fuse extension that allows you to view stuff like a normal filesystem, though I've never tried it: https://manual.seafile.com/latest/extension/fuse/

[–] disobey2623@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago

And obviously, encrypted folders can't be accessed through the file system even with the fuse add on, because that would break the whole point of encryption.

To me, the one big advantage Seafile has is its e2e encryption and encrypted folders, as it allows me to host it externally without allowing access to my files to the server administrator.

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 6 days ago

Looks fantastic, I'll actually be trying this. Love how it doesn't lock my files into some obscure format like seafiles.

[–] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

This looks great, nothing to check it out.

[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

I'll have to say that this is about one of the most detailed instructions I've seen, replete with copious screenshots. I'm going to have to give it a go just based on that. LOL

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago

This is really impressive

[–] sefra1@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

OMG! I've been looking for something like this for quite some time!

I will try this as soon as I have time. Thank you!

[–] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Any way to run the server as a docker container?

[–] tripflag@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Yep -- https://github.com/9001/copyparty/tree/hovudstraum/scripts/docker

Hopefully that description makes sense (let me know if it doesn't)

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 days ago

You can run absolutely anything as a docker container that you have the binary (and other files if needed), or you can go fancy and compile from source in docker.

Just create a dockerfile.

From (some base image you want to use like Ubuntu or Alpine)

Copy necessary files

Run the binary

You can run it straight from command line, put it in a docker compose file, or even tag it and upload it to a repository (and then reference that in your docker compose)

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Can you point me to the WebDAV code? I’m interested to see your implementation. There are some parts of the spec that are ambiguous, and I like to see how those are implemented in different servers.

[–] tripflag@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

sure! my implementation is really basic, just the stuff that's needed to make the clients i've tested happy, so there's probably still clients that won't be able to connect (And i'll fix those as soon as I hear about them!)

httpcli.py is the http methods handler, and the webdav-specific handlers are all next to eachother, propfind // proppatch // lock // unlock // mkcol // and there's also put for the uploads, but that's not entirely webdav-specific, just webdav-aware.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

Thanks! So you put in the displayname prop even if it’s not set by the client. For the life of me, I can’t figure out what that prop is supposed to be in the spec. It calls it a live prop, but doesn’t give an explanation or an equivalent HTTP header.

I love how you named the error for 400 statuses, “Pebkac”! xD

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

This looks nighsome as blossom!

[–] johntash@eviltoast.org 46 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Your readme looks super in depth, thanks for that! I haven't watched the video yet but will later.

I didn't see it mentioned from a quick glance, but is either sftp or ftps supported?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›