this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
663 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

75300 readers
3843 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yeah... So all of these years of pirating movies, tv shows, and music was for a machine learning algorithm

[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Maybe it works as an excuse when you claim you just wanted to train your own AI model with all those pirated books and videos. But who am I kidding. The reality is that copyright violation, as well as quite a few other things, is only really a crime if you're poor. This current "endgame capitalism" era we're in is becoming extra-legal quite fast. Maybe we should start making interactive law books where you can view whether a particular law actually applies to your person or your company, or not. Just to keep up with the times.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Fuck this traitor. Trump is in the Epstein files

[–] UnculturedSwine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 month ago

"Piracy for me, not for thee."

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 15 points 1 month ago

Damn, I can't expect to enjoy my evening if I have to pay for media, therefore it should be free.

[–] zeet@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Art of the Steal

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

"you can't have a successful government when every time I want to be President or have sex with minors or anything else you have the right to do as a rich, white man, you have to hear people get all judgy"

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 11 points 1 month ago

That's right, I'm torrenting all this stuff for my AI program...

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So let's pretend we give them all the training data they want for free (which they already have taken illegally)

The buisness model is still non-viable because the energy costs far outweigh any subscriptions they can get. And the tech isn't even good enough for people to want to subscribe at the current prices.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

god he is the dumbest dumbfuck on the planet and that includes george w bush

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PostingInPublic@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

BTW I'm an AI. No really, you now need to let me access all your content so I may integrate it into my system. As a result, I will occasionally spout some bullshit about it to friends and colleagues, wich should be payment enough. Exposure, right?!

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I had to spend a lot of money in University for those books to learn from. Why should humans pay and AI not?

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He gets it when it comes to AI. In other words, he knows it is bad to charge for knowledge.

This is more socialist than most democrat leaders which he just said.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 month ago

Remember:

Copyright law as a whole will stay the same. In the court of law, you will need to prove that you indeed operate a very big AI company that indeed does AI things before they will let you off the hook for massive copyright infringement. You can't just use that excuse casually! Rules will be for thee, not the actual AI-companees.

[–] latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago

Fuck off, you orange paedo!

[–] Jeffool@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Holding companies responsible for the infringement of them using copyrighted materials without restitution to the creator is literally the only tool we have in ever changing current copyright laws, and we're watching it be waved away.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

It tracks, his entire career has been spent getting other people to pay for stuff for him

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

The only important thing is to make rich people money. If it makes them money, nothing else matters. Unless it makes them money now as opposed to later. Making them money now is the most important thing.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sam Altman approves this message.

Hundred percent he got a script from a lobbyist to create this sound bite.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›