this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
525 points (98.5% liked)

Games

20385 readers
785 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedPandaRaider@feddit.org 26 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Not a fan of porn games (which aren't available here anyway), but that is not a good sign.

Why would they even cater to payment providers? They should not be able to determine whether you bought a porn game or a regular game, just that it's something on Steam.

[–] Grumpy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Payment processors don't know which game you bought. That's not the concern.

Their concern is that the store they do business with provides services to content they deem inappropriate. Frankly, I'm surprised they allowed this much for so long given the past.

Why credit card processors are puritans, I have no idea. But MC, Visa and PayPal have historically always been super anti-porn.

[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 2 points 15 minutes ago

They act puritan to help facilitate business in more restricted cultures like China or Vietnam. Allowing everything that is allowed in the most liberal countries wouldn't loose them their marketshare in those countries. Disallowing it though, that opens those foreign markets with minimal negative effect to their processing volume. How many people are going to blame visa for this? Most will just blame Steam who is just conforming to the standards the processors set.

[–] RedPandaRaider@feddit.org 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That is exactly why I don't understand why they have an issue with it.

They do not know if someone is using the store to buy porn games. So why care? Their concern should be profit, not national driven policies.

[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.org 2 points 31 minutes ago

They care because someone could see that it is possible to buy porn games in the steam interface (they could even make screenshots of a steam checkout page with both the name of a porn game and the visa/MasterCard/PayPal logos visible at the same time) and that would RUIN, RUIN I say, their good reputation.. 😑 Because bank's and payment provider do anything to keep their good reputation with the important people... advertisement companies and other Mc Scrounges

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 9 points 16 hours ago

Payment providers are run by fuckin’ puritans…

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 15 points 21 hours ago

Hey if you want to goon and not pay might I suggest F95zone a wonderful porn game forum with a very good search system. I think it's the dot to that's the proper site, but it's hard to think right now because everything hurts for no fucking reason.

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I didn't know this till I heard a podcast series about this, but the global rulemakes for porn are Visa and Mastercard. They decide what "goes too far" and remove a site from their service if they don't like it, effectively cutting off all revenue streams and killing the site. They did this with porn sites and threatened OnlyFans. There are a bunch of rules they've written for the industry (e.g. fingering an orofice with4 fingers was acceptable, but when the thumb goes in then it becomes "fisting" and this used to be unacceptable), but many rules are unwritten and have to be guessed.

I think this is the podcast series for anyone interested (although I heard this a long time ago and I'm not sure if it was a different series and I'm not going to listen again to confirm).

[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

yup they did this a LONG time ago with porn sites and DVD sales. I used to work in that industry as a web developer in the early 00s. Third party billers specifically set up for the porn industry thrived because of this.

there were many silly rules like you said, no fisting, at most two fingers in the asshole, Incest was "OK" as long as it was "step-" whatever BUT you could get away with it if you laid the ground work initially and say "step-mom" or whatever and then later on just say "mom". Step-Dad was...hit or miss if you could get away with it. Scat was a no go BUT piss was ok IF it was from Europe, sorry US folks, you're not allowed to piss on each other and film it in the good ol United States according to Visa and Mastercard. Finally some stuff like gang bangs or "abuse" porn was fine AS LONG as the girl at the end of the video has a mini interview claiming what a great time she had while covered in jizz. Visa and Mastercard needed to ensure this lady enjoyed herself.

fucking really dumb rules and I would have LOVED to be a fly in the room when Visa and Mastercard lawyers came up with these things.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago
[–] AsyncTheYeen@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

This is gold!! I'd love to read more about it!! It's very fascinating how payment system can control the type of content that is available for consumers

[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 1 points 42 minutes ago

It was pretty wild. I wish I still had the list of visa/MC "no-nos"

I mean honestly the US government was more lax. all they wanted was us to ensure we were following the 2257 stuff and documenting all the talent.

surprisingly though American Express was a lot more "liberal" with this stuff. guess those dudes were just kinkier.

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Does this mean they got rid of that one game where you drug your sister/wife repeatedly so a guy in the hallway doesn't kill you?

12 Minutes that's what it was called !

[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 11 points 16 hours ago

I thought you were talking about Crusader Kings III

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Does it count as repeatedly when its in a time loop?

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

I would argue that since the game requires you to do it multiple times to figure out what's going on, yes it does count as repeatedly.

[–] qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 day ago (11 children)

This is why cryptocurrencies were created. getmonero.org

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 119 points 1 day ago
[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 56 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I wouldn't really care if Steam decided to crack down on porn games, its their store. Payment processors being the ones to force Valve's hands simply doesn't sit right.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 231 points 1 day ago (63 children)

On the one hand, oh noz, the incest games. Who will live without the low effort AI goon crap?

On the other hand, why do the payment companies get to dictate what sales are made? It's my fucking money, or my fucking store. It's not the job of the payment processors to determine if I'm buying illegal goods, just that the money goes from me to the store.

load more comments (63 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›