this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
230 points (99.6% liked)

Gaming

32085 readers
131 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Nice. The movie industry must be shitting themselves if this goes through. They are next.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think this changes anything for movies unless there's somewhere you can "buy" a copy of a movie but they don't let you download an offline copy. If they "rent" you the movie or you "subscribe" to a streaming service, none of this applies.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I know the option for buying movies exist. You can do it on Apple Store. You can download offline, but only into their own ecosystem.

That would be a case, where you are forced to let them download out of Apple Store.

But it's more realistic, that they just remove that option, than letting people download it out of their shop.

[–] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But I want to resell it to the same person for further profit 👉👈🥺 - AAA Game Publishers

[–] Poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not really what this is about.

They could even still keep doing that with Remasters, Remakes, Ports on a new Console, Special Editions, whatever.

[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, what they really do is worse.

They just remove your ability to buy/play the original, so literally everyone loses.

I mean, SKG is about keeping the game still playable, not buyable forever.

[–] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

One of the biggest controversies at the start of all of this was Ubisoft pulling The Crew whilst pushing people to buy The Crew 2. Frankly it’s amazing we haven’t seen that more often with the near identical sequels such as the Madden, FIFA, F1 etc games.

No one’s forcing you to buy a remaster… unless they are because they revoke your right to play the original so it’s your only option.

Remasters and remakes will still happen but companies won’t have as much freedom to yoink a purchased product from your pocket years down the track in the name of some profit strategy.

[–] Poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But I want to resell it to the same person for further profit

One of the biggest controversies at the start of all of this was Ubisoft pulling The Crew whilst pushing people to buy The Crew 2.

I know about The Crew, but it's not like Ubisoft had a Special Edition or something lined up that replaced the original game, and you had to buy it again. There was no reselling, the sequel is a different game.

Nothing in the SKG initiative is against Sequels, Remasters, Remakes, whatever. It's not even about keeping a game in stores forever. It isn't against yearly releases of Fifa, Madden, NBA 2k, that get removed after a few years, as long as you can still play your copy of Fifa 26 in twenty years.

No one’s forcing you to buy a remaster… unless they are because they revoke your right to play the original so it’s your only option.

That's the thing though, does this really happen? Usually games that get completely removed, that you can't even play anymore are multiplayer games, live service stuff, that are just so dead that nobody is even remotely interested in a remaster, so the game is just gone.

[–] i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People could still play the Overwatch that they paid for if the game hadn't been designed to require Blizzard's continued support and approval to function. In some number of years, Fortnite will be shutdown or replaced with something different and the people who grew up playing Fortnite will never be able to go back to play it again.

There's clearly interest in online-only games that are killed. World of Warcraft and Runescape have classic versions so you can play a variation of the game how it used to be.

[–] Poopfeast420@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

True, didn't think about games like this, but that's the case for every online-only game, even if the changes might not be as drastic as OW1 -> OW2. It's not like you can roll back a patch in FF14, Siege or Destiny and play on that version, if you don't like the direction the game is going.

I don't think a part of SKG is making sure all different patch versions of a game are available and playable, once the devs end support for a game.

BTW I'm not against SKG, I've signed the petition, but when people say this would keep companies from selling the game forever, kill yearly installments of some franchise, or would "force" devs to make old version of their favorite game available, that's not what SKG wants to do.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 33 points 1 day ago

It was Nicolae Ștefănuță from the Greens–European Free Alliance which was always going to be one of the political groups more likely to support this initiative.

We need to convince MEPs in the PES and EPP to really get a directive approved.

[–] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 22 points 1 day ago

Please be sure to sign it if you are from the EU. We might need 1.4 million signatures, since some people signed from outside the EU. And those will not count.

https://www.stopkillinggames.com/eci