this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
695 points (97.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

8602 readers
3544 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Soup@lemmy.world 89 points 1 week ago (37 children)

Every single person who complains that “they” is weird has, without the slightest wisp of a shadow of a doubt, said something along the lines of “yeah their coat is just over there” or “I think they were saying that…”. They can already do it, and it’s not hard, they just really wanna hate.

[–] OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm fine with 'they', but I think you're misrepresenting the very real problem that is inserting a 3rd-person pronoun as a personal pronoun due to the existing patterns ingrained and interpreted through speech.

It doesn't hurt me to try and make the conscious change, I do actively try for the people in my life, but it DOES flow weird in my brain and takes more mental effort to keep straight. At least, it still does, it might get easier with more time, I don't know.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

They has always been a 3rd person personal pronoun just like he/she/it have as far as I know. The thing that people find upsetting is that people want to go back to using it as a singular after some grammarians decided everyone should use he or her for a while.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (20 children)

We’ve been doing it for hundreds of years. If you really want to fix something then come up with a plural for “you”; that would be far more helpful.

You may not notice those times you say “they” like in the examples I already gave, but you do say it, and the only thing tripping you up is that you’re thinking about it. It’s like breathing, it’s weird when you’re paying attention but it’s not wrong and you’ve always done it.

[–] JokklMaster@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Pretty sure you was plural and thee was singular. Or something like that.

[–] brisk@aussie.zone 13 points 1 week ago (8 children)

"You" is the plural of "thou". It even has plural grammar ("you are", not "you is")

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (36 replies)
[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

The singular "they" isn't even the first time English has specifically appropriated a plural pronoun for the singular for the sake of social respect!!!

We don't even use the second person singular "thou" anymore, we just use "you" for both of them!

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

At one point in American history the singular they was normal and accepted but the singular you was deeply controversial

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

As a side note, if I'm talking to you, I won't be using "they", that's only for talking about you

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Damage@feddit.it 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Damage@feddit.it 21 points 1 week ago

It's an inherited property, so yeah them too

[–] four@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 week ago

"They did a great job on the last project. They are a valuable member of the team"

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Only weirdos talk to tits, I, as a gentleman, always address each individually (by their preferred pronouns ofc).

/s

[–] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

When he was 2, one of my nephews decided to name my tits after the main characters of his favorite TV show. I thought it was so funny that I still introduce them to partners as Bingo and Rolly.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Lol.

Better than:
- Tom & Jerry
- Mario & green Mario
- Finn & Jake
- Patrick & SpongeBob
- Fox & Dana
- Beavis & Butthead

Ohh, Bingo & Rolly are sweater puppies, now I get it!

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

I still sometimes get those two wrong ...

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I have (begrudgingly) gotten used to "singular they". I accept that I am not an authority on how language is used, and this is how the language has evolved. I'd have preferred a separate singular non-gendered pronoun, but I wasn't consulted because, again, not an authority on the subject. It is fine, I will adapt (and have already done so to some degree).

HOWEVER, I still have beef with what happened to "literally" and will bring it up any time semantic shift is the subject of conversation.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 1 week ago

Asking "how are they doing" when referring to a singular third person has literally always been normal english. The singular they has basically always been fine and proper english.

[–] echolalia@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Shakespeare had no problem with singular they, by the way.

I also found it natural to use before I had a concept of those existing outside the gender binary. "Who left their umbrella?"

Mentioning semantic shift here doesn't seem to do anything but make me imagine you are grandpa Simpson yelling at passing clouds.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

i'm totally grandpa simpson about this. "Literally" is literally a lost cause.

[–] Muaddib@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 week ago

I want to make fun of you for being older than Shakespeare. Even Shakespeare was less of a boomer about singular they

[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Gotten used to the singular they? Were you born in 900 or something? Seriously, the first written example we have of the singular they dates back to the 14th century.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] visc@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Nothing happened to “literally”, its meaning is the same as always and it never means “figuratively”.

When people say “literally” to exaggerate, the word is part of the exaggeration, not describing the exaggeration.

They’re not literally “dead”, they’re “literally dead”. “Literally dead” is the state they exaggerate being in.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hey! It works! Let me ask my wife if I can refer yo her by her tits she says no.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So close. Try, "Hey, babe, do you mind if I refer to this girl online by her tits?"

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wow! You can make my wife say yes?

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So far, it hasn't been too much of a challenge.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah yeah. Take it easy, she can't fit all that.

[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

as the kids say, this sent me 💀

load more comments
view more: next ›