this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
54 points (95.0% liked)

Asklemmy

49469 readers
506 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I get that anything is worth whatever someone is willing to pay for it. That's besides the point. My point is, beyond speculation, what do crypto coins represent?

I also understand that the value of the US dollar is being questioned almost as much without the backing of gold.

But what I really want to know is what is at the foundation level of Bitcoin that people are buying into?

I have a basic understanding of the blockchain, etc. I sold 1BTC in 2017 for $1200 when I thought that was as high as it would go. At this point, at over $100kUSD and rising steadily, what is the $ limit and what is that limit based upon? I thought it was based on the value of mining to check transactions but this seems... not worth $100k to me.

I've been thinking, the only tangible value I personally see in Bitcoin, because it's not really being used as legitimate currency, is for criminals. By now, there must be trillions of dollars in BTC acquired by criminals holding corporations hostage. When you've got people like Trump involved (either explicitly or by way of manipulation) with an executive order to establish a crypto czar, this suggests to me that he's creating pathways for bad actors to more effectively gain more wealth. These are the people who are most excited in Bitcoin, beyond speculation.

I mean, there's little to nothing on the up and up with crypto, right? It's a scam. Right?

Please, factual answers only. I'm looking for someone to dispel my speculation with genuine economics of the matter.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] arsCynic@beehaw.org 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

TL;DR: It's worth whatever a greater fool is willing to pay for it.

Bitcoin is a cult, therefore it's invaluable to the cult members. In reality they're all multi-level marketing pyramid schemes which is what the stock market has degenerated into as well. The former just has more overtly obnoxious shady unethical proponents. It's easier to succumb to greed, selfishness, and seclude oneself from the rest of society by simply buying something that confirms one's fallacy riddled beliefs than it is to question oneself and actively improving society with all of Earths inhabitants, ecosystems, and posterity in mind. Technologically humankind has made great strides, but mentally the majority still thinks like cavemen.

Crypto Cult Science

β€œMoney corrupts; bitcoin corrupts absolutely. Disregarding all of bitcoin's shortcomings, a financial instrument that brings out the worst in peopleβ€”greedβ€”won't change the world for the better.” β€”https://www.arscyni.cc/file/crypto_cult_science.html

[–] Kultronx@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My views on it are the same as the DPRK. A tool used by capitalists that can help fight against capitalism.

[–] comrade_toaster@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can you provide a source? I haven't heard that perspective before but it sounds interesting

[–] Kultronx@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 week ago

https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2025/03/16/north-korea-bitcoin-holdings-top-el-salvador-bhutan-after-bybit-hack/ basically, DPRK hackers constantly steal bitcoin from insecure exchanges or whatever. This helps them get around the genocidal sanctions the west places on them. It isn't disclosed what they use the funds for, but likely in trade with Russia and/or China.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't think bitcoin provides much value in itself. Its basically an asset that is hard to make more of, like money or gold, which are also valuable because of this and that gold and specific currencies are relatively widely used.

bitcoin's supposed added value over money is private digital transactions across the globe in a private way, so that you can send money whoever you want, but it's not practically private, and has so large operating costs (even just the transaction fee) that it's not really better than bank transactions.

so in short: its value is in its scarcity, and that you can speculate on it. the other possible advantages are not realized.

since the value is in speculation, the dollar limit is when investors start selling enough of it so that others will do the same out of fear. which is who knows how much. but it's probably more related to other factors than the dollar value.

[–] Afflictedlife@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's value is in remittance if nothing else. It's cheaper than western union. But the network is only "cheaper" in that way because it has distributed the costs of running the network to the speculating miners who solve pointless puzzles with monsterously greedy processing farms hoping to win the lottery and get back more than they put in. It's a ponzi scheme, it takes more from everyone who came later and gives the value to early adopters who were there when you could solo mine coins with whatever hardware and a bitcoin was worth 7 dollars in exchange. Look up how many coins Satoshi is supposedly holding. If they were to cash out even a small fraction the whole market would crash. So use it as a remittance service but not an asset if you must. This from someone who mined 27k worth of it back when it was 7$ and spent it all on illicit medical cannabis before it inflated to 50k

[–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I believe I've seen recent cost analysis of using crypto exchanges to transfer money across international borders instead of doing direct conversion through whatever "classical" money transfer service and it showed that due to exchange rates, price fluctuations between crypto exchanges, gas fees, and fiat exchange rates into and out of crypto from usd to whatever currency of the recipient its actually tangibly cheaper to just use a direct wire transfer and currency exchange.

I'll have to see if I saved the post with the price breakdowns to send you but I just wanted to share that in case you hadn't heard about it yet. If you had seen that and did find it cheaper somewhere else I'd also be interested to hear where it is actually cheaper. That's just the most recent analysis I had seen of the costs to exchange from fiat to crypto, send internationally, and then withdraw it in the native currency.

Rip to the millions you smoked away btw lol I would've done the exact same honestly

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

USD FX pairs are currently cheaper using traditional transfers.

However going from a non G20 currency to another non G20 currency can be much cheaper using crypto.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cryptocurrencies don't rely on a central entity and is the Lemmy equivalent to Reddit compared to the fiat currency. I like it and I like the technology but

  • Good luck at having a proper stable economy using only crypto. Cryptobros hate central banks but their policies ensure that a loaf of bread doesn't cost 3 times as much the next day. I'd rather have a central trusted authority than not having one
  • Bitcoin by itself sucks. It was the first crypto so it's the most common but it's slow, heavy and costly to operate and to transact on
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cryptobros hate central banks but their policies ensure that a loaf of bread doesn't cost 3 times as much the next day.

The exact opposite. Only after abandoning the gold standard does a central bank have the power to make a loaf of bread cost 3 times as much the next day.

Central banks are a relatively new invention and are not essential in the slightest.

[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They are able to regulate the interest rate. We don't perceive a change of value of our fiat on a regular basis. What yesterday was $1, today is $1.0000001. Good luck maintaining the same purchasing power with Bitcoin (in terms of stability)

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Because they can't run out of money, central banks can be the largest buyer and seller over the short term.

But there is no economic rule that demands those entities exist. For example, from 1863 to 1913 the US had almost no use for a central bank.

Note that I'm very far from suggesting the world's economy should run on bitcoin. Just that central banks are not as essential as they are made out to be. They are used as much to cause inflation as they are to control it.

[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Thank you for your informative reply :)

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

In the same way that MLM and Ponzi schemes are worth something.

How profitable it is is directly proportional to how willing you are to fuck over everyone around you. To how much of an asshole you are.

Bitcoin doesn't even attract criminals as it's traceable. You can easily tell who bought what and traded what. Since all the exchanges are KYC, no criminal worth their salt would use Bitcoin. Instead, they would rather use Monero. The only people buying and selling Bitcoin are people who want to gamble on it getting higher

[–] nitrolife@rekabu.ru 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is a limited amount of Bitcoin, and some of it is lost in forgotten wallets, so the total volume is constantly falling. This may partially increase the price.

But in reality, as in any speculative market, the price of bitcoin depends mainly on faith in it and speculation about world events (some kind of cataclysms, regular statements of this or that person about cryptocurrency, etc.)

The main real value can only be found in countries that are disconnected from SWIFT. However, almost no one appreciates this because there are only 5 officially disconnected countries. However, if this list continues to grow, cryptocurrencies (including Bitcoin) will become more prevalent in international transactions.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The cost to produce new bitcoin doubles every 4 years ( a bit more because new hardware is added). This drags up the price of all the dormant bitcoin.

[–] nitrolife@rekabu.ru 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

There have been no new Bitcoins for a long time. Everything that miners mine is just a transaction tax. In fact, to describe the reason for bitcoin's growth, you need to understand what money is all about. Not just crypto money, but in general. In short, the price is rising because many (including miners) believe that it will rise and do not spend bitcoins. In a normal economy (except Japan), you could just print more money and the price would drop because the currency unit would depreciate. But bitcoin is a mathematical model, and it has a limit. You will not be able to create more Bitcoins than you have already created in any way. Therefore, the belief in the growth and retention of the currency reduces turnover and the price increases. If any of the whales withdraw their entire stock in one day, the market will fall for many years.

UPD: Excuse me, I really made a mistake. You can still mine 3 bitcoins per block... but to be honest, 3 bitcoins for a whole pool is only an eighth of the original 25 bitcoins per person. In general, mining has not compensated for mining for a long time.

UPD: I checked just in case. The average commission payment is now 1.5 bitcoins. almost half of the reward

UPD: I will reveal my thought even more. An ASIC at 1160 Th/s costs 33k dollars and consumes 11 kW. Even in my region with a low-cost light (only 5 cents per kW), such an asic will be able to bring only 58 dollars per day. And it will pay off only in 1.7 years. This is the moment when the miner will FINALLY stop working at a loss. And this is in ideal conditions without increasing the complexity of the network and other things. So all the miners who don't buy huge amounts in bulk barely pay for their business.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

mining has not compensated for mining for a long time.

Fees are less than 2%

The average commission payment is now 1.5 bitcoins. almost half of the reward

I think you have the wrong units. The average fee is 1.5 USD.

And it will pay off only in 1.7 years

This is quite quick. Last time I looked the it was around 3 years. Most of the cost comes from buying the hardware.

[–] nitrolife@rekabu.ru 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

This is quite quick. Last time I looked the it was around 3 years. Most of the cost comes from buying the hardware.

my calculations were made without taking into account the growth of the network's complexity. So, when I tried it last time, the network's complexity had increased so much in a year and a half that the equipment was not bringing in much, and it was not worth the risk of investing. However, things may be different now, and I may be mistaken.

UPD: Now I just buy Bitcoin on exchanges, and it brings me the same % of income as mining. But I don't have to deal with equipment, follow ridiculous laws, or waste electricity. =) That's why I say that many peole just tkabe bitclin to cold wallets. Less bitcloin exists on exchage then grow price.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nitrolife@rekabu.ru 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think you have the wrong units. The average fee is 1.5 USD.

https://bitinfocharts.com/ru/comparison/bitcoin-fee_to_reward.html#3m

Percents you can calculate self. That's not for all blocks, but in a day.

UPD: This is not for every block, of course, but for the whole day. I was wrong about that. Maybe really 2%

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Outwit1294@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

Crypto is as valuable as you want it to be because it is not real. Not being real is a big problem for a currency.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Paper money isn't worth anything innately. Gold isn't either. Not diamonds. Nothing has innate worth except food, air, drinking water, and possibly shelter.

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Gold and diamonds have intrinsic value

Gold is needed for computer parts, and diamonds are used for cutting

They are more than just shiny

Their value will "never" hit 0 (Bitcoin would be worthless without gold for computers)

Yes, we could find substitutes in the future, but for the substances to not be useful somehow is so low and would have to be an apocalyptic scenario. And in an apocalypse, gold could even be worth more.

[–] Semester3383@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

...Except that gold, like the dollar, and like bitcoin, has the value it does because people believe it does. Sure, gold's a great semiconductor. But if that was all we used it for, the price of gold would be a tine fraction of what it is. Diamonds are great as abrasives and in certain cutting applications, but that's all synthetic now. Natural diamonds only have high value because of artificial scarcity and advertising.

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But if that was all we used it for, the price of gold would be a tine fraction of what it is

That's intrinsic value.

[–] Semester3383@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes.

But many people--and I'm not saying you do this--but many people get gold, silver, and diamonds confused, and think that their intrinsic value is linked to their perceived value. does that make sense?

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I get that

I wouldn't buy diamonds or gold hoping they increase in price just as much as I wouldn't buy bitcoin to do the same.

If you offered me 1USD in Gold, Diamond, or Bitcoin.

I would take the gold. It has the most intrinsic value.

The probably that gold hits 0USD is less than bitcoin hitting 0USD.

The only reason you'd take bitcoin is if you think that it has a higher ceiling. Intrinsic value is the floor. But that is gambling

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jeroen@lemmings.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

(Paper) money is practically actually valuable because you need it to pay taxes. Gold, diamonds etc you could do without. Of course there is more nuance but taxes force people to value currency and therefore also accept it from others (because you need some of it or you go to jail), which gives currency the circular value.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί