this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
1242 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

72788 readers
2340 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Companies with stupid leaders deserve to fail.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well what ends up happening is some company will have a CEO.

He'll make all the stupid decisions. But they're only stupid from everybody ELSES perspective.

From his perspective, he uses AI, tanks the companies future in the chase of large short term stock gains. Then he gives himself a huge bonus, leaves the company, gets hired somewhere else, and gets to say "See how that company is failing without me? That's because I bring value to the brand."

So he gets hired at the neeeext place, meanwhile that first company is failing because of the actions of a CEO no longer employed there, and whom bailed because he knew what was coming.

These actions aren't stupid. They're plotted corruption for the benefit of one.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago

AI: The new outsourcing?

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

McNamara fallacy at its finest. They hear figures and potential savings and then jump into the hype without considering the context. It is the same when they heard of lean manufacturing or Toyota way. Companies thought it is cost saving rather than process improvement.

[–] redsunrise@programming.dev 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wonder if there's a market here. I feel like a company that cleans up AI bullshit would make bank lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] devolution@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Kinda like Wal-Mart trying to “save money” with self check out and now they are walking it back.

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

At least in my area they've decided to walk back the walk back.

They went from "Self checkouts are now only for ten items or less" to "Self checkouts are permanently closed" and now they've gone to "Self checkouts can be used for any number of items and also we added four more".

[–] Mushroomm@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They should have just asked me. I knew that would be the result years ago. Writing has been on the screaming wall of faces while the faces also screamed it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Oh noes, who could have seen this coming

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And no doubt struggling to blame their bad decisions on each other and preserve their salary bonuses.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›