this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
642 points (98.3% liked)

News

30714 readers
3435 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hedge-fund billionaire Bill Ackman plans to bankroll a New York City mayoral campaign, arguing that his affluent associates are poised to flood the election with money in an effort to defeat Democratic Socialist frontrunner Zohran Mamdani.

Ackman said he was “gravely concerned” because he believed the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy that would endanger New York’s public services by hollowing out its tax base.

Arguing that his own support of President Trump would automatically disqualify anyone Ackman might put forward, the activist investor said he was making a public appeal: Anyone capable of taking down Mamdani in the Nov. 4 election should step forward and volunteer.

“Importantly, there are hundreds of millions of dollars of capital available to back a competitor to Mamdani that can be put together overnight (believe me, I am in the text strings and the WhatsApp groups) so that a great alternative candidate won’t spend any time,” he wrote.

“So if the right candidate would raise his or her hand tomorrow, the funds will pour in.”

It’s unclear whether New Yorkers would honor such a candidate. The recent intervention by Elon Musk in Wisconsin’s state supreme court election indicated the voting public does not always respond well to billionaires using their money to sway races.

New York mayoral races are notoriously unpredictable due to the city’s chronically low turnout. In 2017, for example, Bill de Blasio won reelection with only 14% of registered voters coming out to support him.

A large influx of New Yorkers heading to the voting booth because they are as concerned as Ackman could easily affect the outcome. If Cuomo can hold on to enough fundraisers, political pundits also point out, it’s possible he could run as an independent like Adams, splitting the left vote and spoiling the race.

Ackman, however, argued all these factors would support the emergence of a centrist candidate looking to position themself on the national stage. It could even be another businessman like Bloomberg, he suggested, although Ackman in an earlier post appeared to indicate he would not seek to run himself.

“For the aspiring politician there is no better way to get name recognition, build relationships with long-term donors, and to showcase oneself,” the hedge fund manager wrote, pitching the campaign like a business deal. “The risk/reward of running for mayor over the next 132 days is extremely compelling as the cost in time and energy is small and the upside is enormous.”

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoenixarise@lemmy.world 55 points 6 days ago

People of NYC: your vote is far more powerful than this dude throwing his lunch money at the opposition.

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 54 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Huh. I wonder why he just doesn't vote for the other person. Isn't that how it's supposed to work? Isn't that what poor people do? I was told voting was important... /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 days ago

I'll do it! Pay me, Billiam!

[–] ThePiedPooper@discuss.online 26 points 6 days ago

Anyone who the billionaire hedge fund manager is planning to bankroll is the guy you probably should be voting against.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 42 points 6 days ago (3 children)

You leaving NYC Ackman? Gonna take Wall St. with you?

Fuck off to Ireland, see if I care.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

There's really no excuse for this

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 27 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

As a potential independent candidate Cuomo didn't poll that bad if you don't consider that:

  • the 39% he got are the same as Mamdani, so it would be 50/50 at best
  • as a known quantity, this 39% are probably his ceiling
  • it still didn't factor Schumer effectively endorsing Mamdani on social media

Political players are in still in flux, but, for the right wing of the Democratic Party, moving against Mamdani is getting riskier and riskier by the day. Not only would they lose the "unity" argument to mobilize the left close to the midterms, but the risk of suffering an humiliating defeat is too great.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 15 points 5 days ago

And it's all because he's ~~a dirty democrat~~ ~~a dirty muslim~~ ~a dirty ~socialist~~ will let poor people be less poor and rich people be a little less rich

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Remember when Bloomberg tried running for president for like 2 weeks?

Somehow I expect similar effect, burning cash without budging almost anyone.

[–] match@pawb.social 32 points 6 days ago

Gimme a hundred million dollars to lose to Mamdani. Sounds like a cushy gig.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago

Hollowing out the tax-base? Of what? Billionaires who have turned tax evasion into a sports championship?

In most places in the world, tax is primarily paid by the working people, not by the rich.

Which obviously leaves them with to much money that they squander on anti-citizen political campaigns like this. When they have the money for bribery on that level, they have the money to pax taxes like everyone else.

[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 26 points 6 days ago

Guy kinda sounds like a douchebag

[–] AmazingAwesomator@lemmy.world 32 points 6 days ago (2 children)

why vote when legal bribes work this well?

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 45 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Because they massively outspent Zohran in the primary and still lost. Vote because you can still overcome this. They want us to give up and think we can't. Don't do their dirty work for them

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 24 points 6 days ago

Always vote, despair after. Don't hand them an easy win.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 31 points 6 days ago

Zohran should drop a diss track collab with Kendrick on Spotify. No amount of billionaire money could combat that.

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 31 points 6 days ago (2 children)

He wants to flood the FPTP ballot with progressive and centrist candidates so that those votes are spread so thin, the single conservative candidate is a shoe in with a landslide 3% of the votes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Ackman said he was “gravely concerned” because he believed the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy that would endanger New York’s public services by hollowing out its tax base.

Fake fucking news. Well all know the wealthy don't pay taxes.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago

Tl;dr: New Yorkers should elect Zohran Mamdani as their mayor, and should re-elect him as long as he chooses to serve.

Got it. Locked in. Never been clearer.

Thanks Bill Ackman!

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago

Sounds like he is a frightened douche-canoe. Fuck that guy.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 6 days ago

by hollowing out its tax base

As if the wealthy pay taxes. GTFO with that BS.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 21 points 6 days ago

FOR SALE: NYC MAYOR

Price: Name your price.

Seller information: The putrid scum that a weeks worth of soaking in bleach wouldn't remove the stench from.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›