this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
610 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2352 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Many on the right claim the U.S. is being "invaded" by migrants but also want to wait until Donald Trump is elected president again to stop it.

For months, Republicans have shouted from the rooftops about a migrant crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border and how President Joe Biden needs to act to address it, insisting the flow of migrants is an urgent national security threat.

Now many on the right are urging their party to reject the very same things they said were needed to fix the problem, including tougher enforcement measures and a proposal to automatically shut down border crossings when it is overwhelmed. Instead, they appear set on impeaching the top Cabinet official in charge of the border, even though there is no evidence of a crime.

The GOP’s contortions aren’t just grating for Democrats but also on some conservative Republicans who have been deeply involved in crafting bipartisan legislation, which is expected to be unveiled soon, that would overhaul how migrants are processed at the border.

“It is interesting. Republicans four months ago... locked arms together and said, ‘We’re not going to give you money for this. We want a change in law,’” Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.), the GOP’s lead negotiator on a deal pairing immigration changes with assistance to Ukraine and other allies, said on “Fox News Sunday.”

“A few months later, when we’re finally getting to the end, they’re like, ‘Oh, just kidding. I actually don’t want a change in law because it’s a presidential election year,’” he added.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 91 points 10 months ago (3 children)

The GOP doesn’t have a platform, they just have a pair of goalposts on wheels.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Republican goalposts are red due to redshift from them moving away.

Democratic goalposts are blue because they move closer/easier. (Campaign for full healthcare, barely get out mandated healthcare markets)

I get that politics are politics, and the right did all they could to kill/maim the ACA, but I needed to complete my light spectrum.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Democrats, despite championing policies that seem to be supported by big chunks of the population are always ^just^ one or two votes short of what they need, so then they throw up their hands, "We tried, sorry... Ok, moving on to other business..." Meanwhile, Republicans will have priorities like forced child labor, killing puppies, and adding lead to drinking water that seem to consistently sail through no matter how small their majority. Democrats seem like they're really ineffective either by just bad luck or on purpose, I've never been quite sure.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

You say that like it was some schrewd devious plan on their part. And not the most natural outcome of having a slim majority. Where if only one or two people jump ship. You are unable to bring stuff to the floor for a vote, let alone pass it.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

This should be expected from conservatives. There are never qny issues or principles, just talking points and scapegoats. Conservativism is the protection and advancement of the self, the in-group that the law protects but does not bind. The "platform," the issues they choose to care about, are the ones most likely to benefit themselves, either directly or as wedge issues to incite their base of voters and donors.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 68 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Hence it is not a ‘crisis’

[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca 37 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] thesprongler@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I'm still waiting for taco trucks on every corner.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

I fucking wish

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (5 children)

There seems to be a 'crisis' at the border every election year and then the 'crisis' suddenly ends if Republicans get into power.

[–] Alenalda@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm still waiting for the next dangerous migrant caravan saga to come along. I expect we'll see it in the next couple months.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Clearly because those traitriots fixed all the problems once they're in charge.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Arthur_Leywin@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I've never hated a group more than conservatives. I feel like I would be a different person if I didn't constantly hate Republican politicians and voters. I feel like I might have been a more "live love laugh" kind of person. It's just depressing at this point.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gennygameshark@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago

This just proves that the "border crisis" is nothing more than a political carrot on a stick for Republican leaders to manipulate their base with.

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago (24 children)

Let me just say the bill is terrible, because it grants a wishlist of right-wing "solutions" turning the border into a militarized zone.

The "crisis" we have is turning away refugees because their skin is the wrong color.

One of my main Biden criticisms is he's been no different than Trump when it comes to the border. He's continued horrible Trump era policies that are responsible for both death and family separation.

Rather than staking a leftwing position, he's ceded all discussion about the border to the rightwing narratives. And I doubt a single person has been swayed by this.

We don't need to "protect" the border. Europe by and large did away with borders and it's been a huge stabilizing factor for them.

The whole "drug smuggling" shit is equally garbage. To the extent drugs cross the border, it's through legal ports of entry. And, it's entirely silly to build up the Mexican border when the Canadian border is basically wide open. Newsflash, drug smugglers know about Canada. Further, we have ports with giant shipping containers of goods that enter and leave the US every day. Do these rightwing idiots really believe drug smugglers wouldn't simply hide drugs in a giant container of soybeans or other food item?

There's a million ways to get drugs into the country, the one way they are the least likely to come in is via some undocumented worker looking to get a job working on a farm in Idaho.

[–] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Right, but it’s the kind of terrible that the GOP supposedly likes, but because they refuse to even associate with democrats much less work with them, they have a knee jerk response to anything they put forward. Nothing will get done in this country so long as the Republican Party has control over anything.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yep, it undermines their only talking-point that has been sticking.

I too agree the border crisis is entirely manufacturered. But that doesn't change the fact that independents / swing voters, and even a large chunk of Democrats have this as a major concern, with it overshadowing inflation now as the overall largest issue.

So Democrats calling Republicans' bluff will offer an excellent rebuttal to any questions or debates down the road.

Reminds me of the Key & Peele skit

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I for one love how Democrats called their bluff.

This completely undermines literally their only talking-point going into election season.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They’ve been screaming about it for 25 years without ever trying to fix it. Why would they start now?

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They've been screaming about abortion for fifty years, yet when they finally got Roe overturned they're dead silent about it.

Almost like they want to campaign on problems not solutions, isn't it?

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I think the 2022 midterms revealed to them what a monumental fuckup that was and continues to be. They are hoping we forget somehow.

[–] Algaroth@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

We have a party just like that in Sweden as well. Literally founded by nazis. They support the current government but still complain about everything. Pure populist fascism.

[–] neidu2@feddit.nl 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

GOP doesn't want solutions, because then they have to stop screaming

[–] xpinchx@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's literally that meme with the guys jamming his bike wheel with a stick.

"There's a crisis" 🥺 "Here's a solution" 🤔 "No" 😠

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They want the ‘crisis’.

[–] ares35@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

the 'deal' is a gift to the far-right in the house. but biden is in the white house, so their guy wouldn't get the credit for 'shutting the border down' when the new limits in the deal are hit.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

Republicans Do Their Own Research! That's why they blame BIDEN for the Border!

[–] Algaroth@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Same people who said they'd have a replacement for the affordable care act day one? It's been "stay tuned" since and nothing but static. Republicans don't even have a policy, just election talking points.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago

Republican politicians don't give a single shit about immigrants. They only rule about it because they want to rile (and rule) their base with cheap shots.

Making a country better is hard. Blaming the immigrants / blacks / Jews / gays / those different / insert whatever group you want, is easy because people hate those that are different. It's also a feedback look where these politicians purposefully increase the hatred. People filled with hate are easy to manipulate. Then you push yourself / your group forward as "the (final) solution (tm) and they'll vote for you.

Honest question to anyone, democrat or republican: when was the last time you saw a republican politician push forward or sign in law anything that wasn't in their own best interest, that wasn't a cheap shot bullshit item (hello, border wall!)? Seriously, when was the last time a republican politician put out a law that really helped the vast majority of their constituents, typically the poor and uneducated?

I can't recall.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

There is no such thing as an honest conservative. Every word uttered by a conservative is either deception or manipulation. Every word.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Of course they opposed fixing something. Heaven forbid something might actually work in the US.

load more comments
view more: next ›