Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54698 readers

364 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

sunbrothersco@lemmy.dbzer0.com

dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com

RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com

119

This community's stance on physical media ownership? (lemmy.world)

submitted 9 months ago by SpiceDealer@lemmy.world to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

51 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I might be asking a rhetorical question here but I was curious as to the overall consensus on physical media. Do support it because, unlike streaming, media can't take away what you've payed for? or are you against because it's a waste of money when you can "acquire" it through "alternative means?" I'm also thinking about getting a 4K Blu Ray player for when my wife and I get a new place; preferably one that can also play self hosted media. What do you guys think?

(page 2) 1 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] maness300@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I download things like good movies, video games, and music.

I stream things like TV shows on free streaming sites.

A lot of people here don't understand that having something saved on a storage device is the exact same as owning it physically.

They believe that having a box for a disc with cover art on it matters, or something.

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments