this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
133 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

1441 readers
821 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SYLOH@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Japan has been stuck in the year 2000 for 40 years. Baby steps forward is still progress.

[–] MrCookieRespect@reddthat.com 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Rather in the early 90s when we are honest.

[–] MrEff@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

The saying they are referring to is: In the year 1980, Japan was living in the year 2000. And in the year 2020, Japan was living in the year 2000.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 21 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Does anybody really need more than 1.44 MB of storage capacity?

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 months ago

Geez. It would take me about 1.5hrs to download that much. It'll take even longer if Mom picks the phone up.

[–] misterundercoat@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

640K ought to be enough for anybody.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They’ll probably just switch to fax.

[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Beat me to the fax reply lol

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Your profile picture does not disappoint

[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago
[–] UndefinedIsNotAFunction@programming.dev 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In other news, the last manufacturer of floppy disks has closed it's doors today

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Plenty of systems still use them, but the equipment isn't critical. They are usually only found in jets and medical equipment. Lulz. I would suspect that lots of older manufacturing equipment uses floppy disks as well.

The logic goes that it's cheaper to pay top dollar for legacy computer parts as replacing the actual machine costs millions.

[–] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I can’t imagine it would be impossible to create something that uses the same protocol using a raspberry pi pico or similar. I see some exciting USB drive based “floppy drives” on Amazon for like $30 already.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

In some cases, it usually boils down to specialized hardware and software. The software might make an obscure call to a function that only exists in only one specific version of hardware, as an example. (In some cases, the original company who made the machine or the original developers may not even exist any more.)

I would imagine that at least for manufacturing, it's more efficient to use original parts. From a factory owner perspective, it's better to use a part that is proven to work instead of a hack. A thousand dollars for a floppy drive is pocket change when an hour of downtime costs several thousand dollars. In those cases an engineer should err on the side of reliability.

I don't want to pretend that I know the details of mass production, because I don't. I am just repeating things I have heard over the years.

Edit: Just replace the machine! Well, there are cases where that can't happen. A similar example that I know of relates to major components of Navy ships. If a large engine component needs to get changed, they have to cut massive holes through each deck of the ship just so they can lift out and replace that component. It's a hell of a process. Similar situations could occur in large factories where machines are hundreds of thousands of tons and buried deep in the bowels of an old factory.

[–] ChallengeApathy@infosec.pub 9 points 10 months ago

Boo. I miss floppies and everyone complains about Japan being "behind the times" on some things but honestly, only in ways that are cool or good for civilians' privacy.

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago
[–] huf@hexbear.net 6 points 10 months ago

they'll probably require CDs now...

[–] voight@hexbear.net 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How big are modern floppy disks generally?

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't think "modern" floppy disk are a thing so it's 1.44 MB.

[–] voight@hexbear.net 0 points 10 months ago

Typical bullshit from the Japanese government then damn