Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
I have to wonder who this appeals to?
Most are already trapped in something established like Discord, WeChat, FB Messenger or Telegram. As said, security isn’t a strong point, and there’s no engagement angle.
I guess if you already spend tons of time on X it’s kinda convenient?
I think people are missing the way this is actually a win. Obviously, nobody should be using it as their primary communication, just as nobody should be using FB Messenger as their primary communication. However, just like when Messenger added E2EE, having encrypted DMs on X is just smart. Less of a burden on a company in the event of data breaches and likewise less of a concern for individuals. It also means that normies have a slightly reduced risk of leaks.
Again, obviously no one SHOULD be using X for private conversation but having any form of E2EE on DMs is a win in my book.
It sounds like this isn't E2EE based on the article - there has been no papers published, and the verbiage in privacy agreements still states Twitter can decrypt your messages as needed. That indicates this is functionally similar to the old messages.
I guess that's a fair point. Ultimately, I'm not interested in caring that much about whether or not a platform can read my messages. I just don't want them to be able to be accessible if there's a data breach. I would never use these platforms' private messages for anything that is remotely sensitive but it's generally a good idea to keep messages away from data breaches as much as possible.
Add a feature that rings an alarm whenever a journalist is added to your group chat and you'll bring all the president's loonies to the yard
Aw man i can’t give up Xitter! Those skeevy fascist hucksters depend on my credulous clicks!