this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
1377 points (99.0% liked)

Science Memes

14653 readers
3258 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 56 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

I suppose this will become an arms race, just like with ad-blockers and ad-blocker detection/circumvention measures.
There will be solutions for scraper-blockers/traps. Then those become more sophisticated. Then the scrapers become better again and so on.

I don't really see an end to this madness. Such a huge waste of resources.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 21 points 12 hours ago

there is an end: you legislate it out of existence. unfortunately the US politicians instead are trying to outlaw any regulations regarding AI instead. I'm sure it's not about the money.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I'm imagining a break future where, in order to access data from a website you have to pass a three tiered system of tests that make, 'click here to prove you aren't a robot' and 'select all of the images that have a traffic light' , seem like child's play.

[–] Tiger_Man_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

All you need to protect data from ai is use non-http protocol, at least for now

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tiger_Man_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

How can i make something like this

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (10 children)

Cool, but as with most of the anti-AI tricks its completely trivial to work around. So you might stop them for a week or two, but they'll add like 3 lines of code to detect this and it'll become useless.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Vari@lemm.ee 72 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I’m so happy to see that ai poison is a thing

[–] ricdeh@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Don't be too happy. For every such attempt there are countless highly technical papers on how to filter out the poisoning, and they are very effective. As the other commenter said, this is an arms race.

[–] arararagi@ani.social 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So we should just give up? Surely you don't mean that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 45 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

This is surely trivial to detect. If the number of pages on the site is greater than some insanely high number then just drop all data from that site from the training data.

It's not like I can afford to compete with OpenAI on bandwidth, and they're burning through money with no cares already.

[–] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 25 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah sure, but when do you stop gathering regularly constructed data, when your goal is to grab as much as possible?

Markov chains are an amazingly simple way to generate data like this, and a little bit of stacked logic it's going to be indistinguishable from real large data sets.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 20 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine the staff meeting:

You: we didn't gather any data because it was poisoned

Corposhill: we collected 120TB only from harry-potter-fantasy-club.il !!

Boss: hmm who am I going to keep...

[–] yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca 13 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

The boss fires both, "replaces" them for AI, and tries to sell the corposhill's dataset to companies that make AIs that write generic fantasy novels

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 140 points 20 hours ago (7 children)

It's so sad we're burning coal and oil to generate heat and electricity for dumb shit like this.

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

im sad governments dont realize this and regulate it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] rdri@lemmy.world 25 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Wait till you realize this project's purpose IS to force AI to waste even more resources.

[–] kuhli@lemm.ee 81 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

I mean, the long term goal would be to discourage ai companies from engaging in this behavior by making it useless

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 hours ago

That's war. That has been the nature of war and deterrence policy ever since industrial manufacture has escalated both the scale of deployments and the cost and destructive power of weaponry. Make it too expensive for the other side to continue fighting (or, in the case of deterrence, to even attack in the first place). If the payoff for scraping no longer justifies the investment of power and processing time, maybe the smaller ones will give up and leave you in peace.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 189 points 22 hours ago (10 children)

Deployment of Nepenthes and also Anubis (both described as "the nuclear option") are not hate. It's self-defense against pure selfish evil, projects are being sucked dry and some like ScummVM could only freakin' survive thanks to these tools.

Those AI companies and data scrapers/broker companies shall perish, and whoever wrote this headline at arstechnica shall step on Lego each morning for the next 6 months.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 47 points 21 hours ago

Feels good to be on an instance with Anubis

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 392 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Funny that they’re calling them AI haters when they’re specifically poisoning AI that ignores the do not enter sign. FAFO.

[–] Clanket@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago

Fair As Fuck Ok?

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 40 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

First Albatross, First Out

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 13 points 13 hours ago

Fluffy Animal's Fecal Orifice.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] passepartout@feddit.org 248 points 23 hours ago

AI is the "most aggressive" example of "technologies that are not done 'for us' but 'to us.'"

Well said.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 37 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

"Markov Babble" would make a great band name

[–] peetabix@sh.itjust.works 14 points 15 hours ago

Their best album was Infinite Maze.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 45 points 20 hours ago (16 children)

Could you imagine a world where word of mouth became the norm again? Your friends would tell you about websites, and those sites would never show on search results because crawlers get stuck.

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 7 points 14 hours ago

That would be terrible, I have friends but they mostly send uninteresting stuff.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 81 points 23 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›