this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
295 points (99.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

61199 readers
403 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I removed the link to the article, since the article is on Medium, and Medium is becoming a shithole too. So here is the article. It was written by JA Westenberg and she's at https://www.joanwestenberg.com/

Subscription payments are the best thing that ever happened to software companies. And they’re arguably the worst thing that ever happened to their customers.

When I started as an aspiring digital artist in the early 2000s, saving up to purchase software like Adobe Photoshop felt like an investment — once bought, it was mine to use indefinitely. I remember putting away dollars from my paper route to buy my first copy as a kid, already dreaming about my future as a creator.

Later, as a teenager working at McDonald’s, I repeated the ritual of patient saving until I could finally purchase music production software such as Ableton Live. Owning those tools outright meant using them freely without worrying about ongoing costs. My creative output wasn’t bound to what I could afford month-to-month.

Now, companies like Adobe solely offer subscriptions — monthly fees and essentially renting in perpetuity. We no longer own our software; we pay a licensing fee.

This gives us access to regular updates, but it also means the sword of Damocles hangs over creatives — miss a payment, lose access. The freedom of creation I once relished has been supplanted by nagging financial anxiety. I miss the days when the tools felt like mine, not someone else’s borrowed goods, and when I didn’t open up a tool and wonder how much longer I’d be able to keep using it.

The Drawbacks for Customers Here’s the drawback. If I live as long as I want, paying for Photoshop every month will be very, very bloody expensive.

Yes, subscriptions provide convenience and access to varied services and products. But convenience just isn’t enough.

Psychologically, subscriptions drive overconsumption. Our paychecks are eaten away in advance before we realise how many 30-day free trials and monthly tithes we’ve committed ourselves to. And while the subscriptions seem small enough on paper, their cumulative cost is straining the budget for consumers and creatives.

We’re told repeatedly that it’s just the price of one coffee a month, but the combined cost of every single tool, service, app and game demanding one coffee a month becomes the equivalent of paying for enough caffeine to poison even the strongest constitution.

The proliferation of subscription services has led to increasing fragmentation of content. As platforms vie for customer attention, consumers confront myriad fragmented options, each requiring an individual subscription. This results in higher costs for accessing content and a disempowering user experience of juggling multiple platforms and subscriptions. The promised convenience of subscriptions is eroded, leaving customers questioning the true benefits.

It’s easy to understand why company after company is shifting their model. The allure of stability is compelling, and subscription payment models provide just that for businesses. Rather than relying on sporadic one-time purchases, companies can enjoy consistent, predictable revenue streams month after month thanks to loyal subscribers. This stable financial base allows businesses to plan for and invest in future growth, pleasing investors and looking good on paper. But that stability is hardly a victory for users who just want good software and aren’t particularly interested in quarterly earnings reports.

Customer loyalty is the holy grail for companies, and in theory, subscriptions foster (aka coerce) enduring relationships with customers, reducing the risk of losing them to competitors. This is achieved through the “lock-in effect,” where the convenience and perceived value of continuing a subscription discourages customers from seeking alternatives.

But instead of using the foundation of a subscription to cultivate long-term relationships and capitalize on increased customer lifetime value, companies treat users like a Sure Thing, taking them for granted and adding little in terms of value to justify the monthly fee.

There’s a popular argument that subscription payment models championed entrepreneurs and startups, levelling the playing field in an industry historically dominated by major players. It allows smaller companies to enter the marketplace with minimal upfront costs and directly compete with industry giants. But when all these startups want to do is sell more subscription services, it starts to seem at least a little Ponzi-esque.

And then there’s the unfortunate reality that when the economy is tanking, rents are going up, housing is unattainable, food is an arm and a leg, and it’s too expensive to put petrol in the car, more than a few users are going to look at the laundry list of adorably vowel-averse SaaS startups they keep throwing their money at and ask whether they actually need them. There’s a perfectly good email app that comes pre-installed on their phones. The same goes for the To-Do list and Notes apps. At some point, the subscription creep stops making sense.

The ongoing commitment of subscriptions is a massive burden, limiting our flexibility to adapt our spending as needs change. This financial load becomes a significant barrier to achieving financial well-being. We’re stuck in a subscription payment hamster wheel. And something is going to have to give.

Companies recognizing the potential drawbacks of subscriptions have started innovating within the model. Some offer flexible subscription options, allowing customers to pay for services or products on a usage basis. Others are exploring bundled subscriptions, providing diverse content or services at a reduced cost. These approaches address customer concerns while maintaining business benefits by prioritising customer value and flexibility.

But they’re still dodging around one simple fact. The best way for consumers to access software is to buy an app that does what they need and then choose whether or not to upgrade to the next version later. It’s a model that doesn’t require a spreadsheet of monthly expenses to wrangle alongside gas, electricity and medical bills. Although I’m sure there’s a subscription-based app to make it all easier. Roughly the cost of a coffee a month?

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] VirgilMastercard@reddthat.com 10 points 5 hours ago

Endless subscription services is a major part of advanced capitalism

[–] N0VERCLOCKER@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

I can see how subscriptions are very helpful to handling expenses on the business side especially for any program that operates in a way that security updates are important. But far too many companies have set the price way to high and hid it with a short time so it looks cheap. If yearly was the default length and was reasonably priced then I would be fine with them but $5 a month for a lot of things that could easily be $5 a year is too much.

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

"Oh it’s just the price of a coffee!"

Yeah, a fricking humongous extra sprinkles double dipped thrice whippy foamy PSL at US$12.99…

Now with every single function requiring another app, extra package or add on these days, all those "just a coffee" added together amounts way too close to a mortgage…

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

The inherent issue is that they do not decouple security updates and bug fixes from feature updates

I paid $450 for professional software suite x 2012. I expect it to work for quite some time based on that extreme price. 2 patches come out during the year 2012 that fix some bugs, but not all.

Software suite x 2013 comes out. A cool new feature is added, maybe 2 or 3. It’s also the most stable version yet! Fixing even more bugs. (More bugs are introduced with the new features but whatever). $500 or $129 upgrade

I don’t want the new features. I just want the bug fixes. I don’t have that option.

Unraid is one of the few pieces of software I’ve seen with this option. They initially did a perpetual license for years, several levels up to $129. They found that didn’t cover costs. Now they have a model where you purchase a license and keep that but updates are subscription based. Your license lasts one year but you can run the software in perpetuity. You can download updates for that year and you can extend the license for $36 to download updates for an additional year.

In addition to that critical security updates are free to download even if your license is expired and are produced until your version hits end of life, which is when 2 major revisions come after (e.g. they’re on 7.1.0 now, that will be EOL as of version 7.3.0). If you truly want updates in perpetuity they still offer that as well, it just costs almost 2x as much now ($249).

That said if you want a NAS go with free software. I won’t judge you if you use unraid, it’s easy to use, but there are non proprietary and FOSS options where licensing isn’t an issue at all for home use (or at all)

[–] couch1potato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Just to add on since you mentioned unraid; i was a complete noob to self hosting and docker and unraid helped me learn the basics by dipping my toes in with their community apps store and then later with docker compose. Highly recommend if you're just starting out and learning.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Unraid is fine and if you use it no judgement but truenas will cost you $0, is open source, and the kubernetes or docker implementation (depending on core vs scale) is fairly similar with community apps as well plus vms and such if you go with scale. Unraid is simpler because you don’t need to fuck with zfs by default but now that zfs expansion is a thing it’s really a no brainer to go with zfs for the majority of self hosting scenarios imo

or go with proxmox, or just Debian or whatever but those have a much higher learning curve

[–] couch1potato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Good to know, thanks. I haven't tried anything else since the ~2 years I've started but who knows what the future holds. If unraid prices go any higher than they just increased to i may start looking at other options.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Oh it’s not worth it to switch, unraid licenses are forever (unless they really fuck people over) and changing at this point would mean destroying your data

[–] couch1potato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 55 minutes ago (1 children)

Yeah but they have a new system where you either pay annually for new updates, or the new "forever" license is something like $249.

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 22 minutes ago

Even if you don’t pay for updates you can still run the software perpetually, you just don’t get updates

[–] N0VERCLOCKER@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 hours ago

It is definitely better when they still have a proper versioning system and it is unfortunate that many handle it poorly even outside of subscription programs.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Fair point. I don't mind paying for something that's worth it. But way too much stuff is just becoming bloated and expensive.

I was actually paying $7 a month for Microsoft Word subscription. At the time, having access to it was helpful, and my workplace/school used it. But fuck that noize, I canceled that today too.

LibreOffice all the way for me, baaaby!!

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 23 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

"Subscription Economy Sucks"

*immediate popup to subscribe

I mean... c'mon, that's just way too easy.

Print media subscriptions were a drop in the bucket for revenue, everything was paid for by creating community and bringing eyeballs to ads. Ads that didn't track you or pop up over the newspaper or lead the reader to a malicious underground card room. Internet publications dropped the ball hard on these points and now? We have to subscribe and pay, at the least, our privacy.

Thanks for copying the article OP (and this article does appear "free") but: fuckyou Medium, Inc.

[–] deedan06_@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 10 hours ago

I still don'z get why all the newspapers don't wirk together and create one combined subscription. Most people would can afford one so i don't see much money lost in everyone working together.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

*immediate popup to subscribe. I mean… c’mon, that’s just way too easy.

Oh, that's annoying. Sorry! I didn't get any popup, but I have pretty strong popup blockers installed.

I removed the link since that happened to ya.

So yeah, fuck Medium too...

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago

Oh don't worry about little old me. I just run my browser allowing it. I did notice I had to go back in private mode to replicate it so they probably just set a cookie that I didn't want to be bothered by that shit. It will come back every time I restart the browser but it's not a big deal. I found it ironic that a subscription based service was complaining about other subscription based services.

Use linux, End of 10, right?

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

After Adobe announced yet another subscription price hike recently, I finally decided to walk away for good. I’ve used Adobe products for over 30 years; I was a professional graphic designer before I retired. But enough is enough.

Modern versions of Photoshop and Illustrator are cloud-locked and subscription-only, which makes them difficult to pirate or even just use offline. Older versions are still out there, but you have to dig through crack installers, run scripts to block network access, and constantly deal with system-level headaches, especially on a Mac. Maybe it’s easier on PC, but for me, it just wasn’t worth the time or risk.

And honestly, I’ve had enough of Adobe’s monopoly. I didn’t even feel like looking for a workaround.

So today, I switched to different software that does most of what I need. And I wiped every trace of Adobe from my system. No subscriptions. No lock-ins. From now on, if I’m going to pay for software, I want to own it. And it better run whether I’m online or not.

Never again.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

For anyone who hasn't seen this yet:

https://youtu.be/lm51xZHZI6g

[–] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 9 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (3 children)

A subscription model for hardware like bikes or washing machines would be interesting. If it breaks, someone will come and repair it. But subscription for software is a scam. I switched to open source solutions because fuck'em, that's why! Breaking up with Adobe is pretty great. :)

[–] gratux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Hardware subscriptions already exist in the form of HP Instant Ink and similar programs. Now you can continue to pay for your printer, but never get to own any of it, how great!

You don't want hardware subscriptions. You should own the things you buy.

[–] blindsight@beehaw.org 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Depends on the item and your goals.

If you're a "car person" who always wants to have the latest model, then maybe leasing a car makes sense. Every 3 years, you get a new car.

Phones are similar; there are some plans where you are expected to return the phone every 1-2 years. If you really want the newest model all the time, then that might be a good plan for you.

But for a printer, that only makes sense if you're a business with medium print volumes and no IT budget. For home use, that's insane when a cheap last printer will last decades. We have a B&W laser from 2 decades ago and a used colour laser we got for free/very cheap (the power button is broken but it otherwise works great). I'm guessing we pay about 1-2% of an HP subsription.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Where I live, there are water heater rentals. It's essentially a hardware subscription.

They're garbage.

For something that needs minimal maintenance and will last at least 10 years, you can rent for the price that you'd break even if you had a new one installed every 5 years.

People will pay thousands of dollars to have the privilege of throwing out the water heater and getting out of the contract. And then pay to buy a new one they actually own.

But some people like it because, yes, if there's a problem, they come and fix it for you. Or give you a brand new water heater. That you've already paid for two or three times over!

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It's insane. The most painful thing I ever did was buying out of that water heater contract. Painful because I had zero interest in paying a red cent to those bastards, but I had no choice, their contracts are so iron-clad they've got them written by default into the literal home purchase agreement that the provincial government provides. I tried to reject that term in the home purchase agreement and refuse to take on the contract, but the seller threatened to walk away when I did that and I really wanted the house. So I sucked it up, bought the house, took the contract and bought it out, or rather tried to. They even made that a giant pain in the ass (fuck you, EnerCare!) Tried to tell me I didn't live at the address where the water heater was, because they had put a nonexistent house number on it and they kept relentlessly trying to make excuses to try to sell me on their stupid maintenance plan instead of correcting the information. Eventually I screeched and pestered and threatened them until they finally accepted my giant proscribed racketeering payment to take their bullshit off my bill, and thankfully I've never heard from them since, and I hope I never will.

I continued to use the thing for many more years until got old enough that it was making horrible banging noises and decided to replace it before it failed. happily got rid of the thing (which was actually a decent unit, I guess they don't want to have to actually repair/replace them when they've got you on forever-contract), and for only slightly more than the buyout payment, bought myself a fancy new water heater that I own for myself like a real adult,

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

Thank you for sharing. I don't have direct personal experience with a rental water heater -- I was thrilled to find out the place I bought was built before it became the norm, and none of the prior owners got duped into getting a subscription.

Subscriptions suck. The only exceptions are if you literally have too much money to care. But most people don't have the money to throw around like that.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 hours ago

Ugh, that's frustrating! I haven't seen anything like that in my area, but I'm sure it'll come.

[–] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago

I switched to open source solutions because fuck’em,

Yep, same! It's gonna be a bit of a learning curve since I was with adobe for over 30 years, but meh, I have the time to learn my away around. Fuck Adobe!

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 3 points 9 hours ago

Atari teenage Riot still use Atari ST computers for their music..

Creatives literally cannot afford to use subscription software that could at any moment break your workflow for any or no reason.

[–] fuViWwE3VQ2475@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 hours ago

scribe [dot] rip ?