this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
2187 points (98.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

7742 readers
2208 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 377 points 1 week ago (9 children)

SOMETIMES A CHECKMATE IS JUST SO FUCKING POETIC.

Butters: weiners out!

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 148 points 1 week ago (3 children)

For real, this is such a great move. Oh sure, the government could just ban nipples in general, but good luck enforcing that when it gets mildly warm and every scottish man rips their shirt off

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago

is that the "red wave" they've been warning us about?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 196 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

Another example of the Scots fighting for freedom .... they've been doing it successfully for thousands of years and they're still doing it!

I will never in my life ever understand the fight against gay, lesbian, bi, queer, LGBTQ+

They are a fraction of the population yet the majority causes them immeasurable harm simply because they exist. The louder they persecute, the more prominent LGBTQ+ movement becomes .... it's contradictory. If conservatives had just left them alone, there would almost be no issue about any of this at all.

There are far more important debates and fights to be had in our society .... namely the fight to preserve the survivability of our species in the coming centuries ... yet here we are fighting about who gets to show or not show their tits!!!!

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 98 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Conservatives need a demographic to hate. This one is perfect because they will never be Conservatives, and most hardcore Conservatives can't stand to see homosexual PDA.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)

they will never be Conservatives

I wish that were true, but I have family that is deeply conservative and so is her wife.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There's nothing to understand. It's about hate and fear. Conservatives, specifically the alt-right, uses pre-existing prejudices to whip fear into their followers so that they get distracted.

"If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."

You can change this to whatever out-group they have chosen:

  • Trans-people
  • autistic people specifically
  • LGBT people
  • neurodivergent people
  • gay people specifically
  • muslims
  • non-white people
  • black people specifically
  • Catholics (if you're protestant)
  • Protestant (if your Catholic)
  • left handed people

The list literally goes on. All so that their followers get distracted from the people who are picking their pockets.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] wolfrasin@lemm.ee 173 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Legendary behavior. Bigots can choke on it

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 155 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It would have been icing on the cake if trans men would have been in the same protest, also topless, but they weren't censored lol

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (5 children)

To many in alt right groups, trans men don't exist.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] VirgilMastercard@reddthat.com 138 points 1 week ago (17 children)

Tits censored, guess they are women then. Fuck the transphobes

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 116 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is what we call a brilliant catch-22 situation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 102 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Biological women can do it too if they print and cut out pics of men nipples and stick them on top.

[–] HakunaHafada@lemm.ee 97 points 1 week ago

Malicious compliance at its best.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 92 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'll always remember this one time in the 1990s when my family and I were watching some medical documentary on cable TV. There was footage of a trans woman getting top surgery, and they showed the medical details and cutting of her uncovered chest with no problem, but the instant the breast implant was slipped beneath the patient's skin they blurred out the nipple because it became unsuitable for unedited broadcast at that moment.

i think about that moment a lot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 79 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Trust me when I say this: none of the right-wing media/politicians, will understand that they've made any points on behalf of the protestors by blurring the "men's" nipples.

Also, saying men can go around topless but not women, is sexist. Any such law should be removed. We should all be equal in the eyes of the law. With that said: that shouldn't imply that women should go around topless. It should just be legally allowed. I'm a guy, but I don't think I need to explain to anyone the potential complications from going around topless as a woman... Whether trans or not.

The whole situation is dumb. Society needs to do better. We're all people. Let's keep that in mind and treat everyone the same, based on the fact that they are a human person in society. No legal separation of sex, gender, race, religion, or anything else. If you are a human person, you should have the same rights and freedoms as every other human person.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 73 points 1 week ago (9 children)

I'm a guy, but I don't think I need to explain to anyone the potential complications from going around topless as a woman... Whether trans or not.

It's normal and fairly mundane for men to go topless in virtually all societies, however, there are a good number of cultures where it is also normal for women to be topless. If it is normal and mundane for women to be topless, then it becomes a non-issue eventually. It's only racy because we're trained in our culture to find it racy.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] zanyllama52@infosec.pub 71 points 1 week ago

Damn, these people are bold as fuck. Get it!

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 70 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

In America most men are overweight or obese and have pendulous lumps on their chests with nipples attached. Personally I don't love seeing them, but when the weather is right, they are all over the goddamn place. It's absolutely ludicrous that women can't do the same. If there were any logical rule it would be don't show your chesticles unless you are a woman who uses them for feeding a child OR everybody gets to have their tits out regardless of any gender types. Pick one and go with it, but the current laws are base AF.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (4 children)

When I was in pre-K, on a really hot day, I remember asking why the boys got to take off their shirts but I couldn’t.

Now that I’ve had top surgery, I can be the fat hairy bearded guy that mows lawns shirtless. It’s nice.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Austin actually has a city ordinance with more or less this exact logic. Once you’ve seen a dozen or so average women with their chests uncovered at the pool, it loses any excitement it may have initially held.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 days ago

i don't think that's really true, people in the west generally don't cover their faces and yet people find faces attractive anyways.

My preferred argument is just "if people find naked bodies so appealing why would you not want to see more of them?"

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] EySkibidiBabBab@feddit.dk 62 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A living edge case. I love it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maximumbird@lemm.ee 60 points 1 week ago

Fucking Genius

[–] grue@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago

Hmm...

spoiler


Pretty sure it's just a bug in the federation of images between blahaj.zone and lemmy.world, but it was a funny coincidence.

[–] LadyButterfly@lazysoci.al 45 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Love the message, but the blurb isn't correct. Police couldn't not arrest them because it would define them as a woman, outraging public decency and similar laws don't require specific genders.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

actually proud of Scotland for once, not the government but the people

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

It's the UK supreme court, not a Scottish court, that decided to stomp over all the progress we had made with trans rights.

The Scottish Parliament tends to be considerably more left wing than the UK Parliament. Left to their own devices they would probably be much more like a Scandinavian country.

But actually, yes, the Scottish people are indeed awesome.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›