this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
182 points (98.9% liked)

Android

17724 readers
58 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] electro1@infosec.pub 54 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Yep, this is why I lost faith in these giant tech companies, my next phone will be Fairphone

[–] fubbernuckin@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I'm waiting for a fairphone with a headphone jack and then hopping on that.

[–] electro1@infosec.pub 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Oh, the headphone jack... using a phone without it is so counter productive and annoying, wait for the phone to fully charge, now wait for your headsets to charge too, I don't know why we're moving backwards πŸ™„

[–] Enk1@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (7 children)

I used to feel this way until I realized that a large percentage of phone users rarely used earbuds or headphones, including myself. Wired earbuds were a pain in the ass, nobody wanted to carry a coiled up cable in their pocket all day. But a little clamshell with a couple small buds in it fits pretty well into a jeans pocket. Once wireless earbuds hit the market, everyone started using them for a reason.

The only real argument for an analog headphone jack at this point is audio fidelity, and if you care about that you're 1, not using your phone with a cheap DAC to do it and 2, your headphones probably use a 1/4" jack not a 3.5mm one. Wireless protocols are also catching up to analog as far as audio quality as well, and most people expect IP68 from a good phone these days, and you're not getting that with a 3.5mm audio jack or removable battery.

The consumers who care about an audio jack on phones these days are a very vocal minority.

[–] fubbernuckin@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They were no more of a pain than fishing out a wireless holder, and they took up even less space. The reason people used wireless was because manufacturers stopped giving people the option to use wired. That being said, having a headphone jack still lets you use wireless.

And nobody actually uses wired for audio quality, they use it because they don't have to charge their headphones and separate headphone case or deal with the health of another battery, they can connect and disconnect their audio devices faster and easier, they don't have to pay for an extra wireless chip and dac in their headphones or a third battery and electronics in a case.

There's actually quite a few good reasons to have the option available if you want it. I'd argue this is a "dress with no pockets" scenario, where everybody begrudgingly puts up with it because the manufacturers don't give them an option.

Pretty much every single person i talk to about this thinks that removing the headphone jack was a stupid idea, and those who don't think it's stupid are indifferent anyway.

[–] v81@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Galaxy S5 was IP67 with a headphone socket, removable battery and dedicated microSD card slot. Others have also existed. Taking like adding a headphone socket costs more than 5 cents is stupid.

I'm a Bluetooth buds convert now, but I'd still like the choice.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Wired earbuds were a pain in the ass, nobody wanted to carry a coiled up cable in their pocket all day. But a little clamshell with a couple small buds in it fits pretty well into a jeans pocket.

Lmao what??

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SuperSpecialNickname@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Did everyone forget that Galaxy S5 exists with headphone jack, removable battery and water resistance?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 10 months ago

Whole disagreeing with you on usefulness of the jack, I will still point out one correction.

The USB c standard actually includes analog audio pin outs. So fidelity wise there's no difference between using the adapter vs a 3.5mm jack.

However, since the removal of the jack, most phones have really skimmed down the dacs. Makes me miss my LG v40.

[–] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 4 points 10 months ago

Exactly. If anything, I'd much rather like to see a secondary USB-C port, preferably on top of the device. That would be an actual benefit for almost everyone.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago (10 children)

The point is that their earbuds are absolutely non repairable, and admittedly so. Really hope they can improve that, but I think they might just discontinue the earbuds in favour of repairable headphones.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That's what these are for

They are also available in a few different shapes that may work better depending on device and user preferences and cost like 2-6 bucks on Ali. I use a different one with my steam deck that also has a little U adapter that 180s the plug direction and braces it against the back so it doesn't torque off if I rotate the device in my hands.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 16 points 10 months ago

Having a jack entirely avoids the introduced problem by only having a USB port. Ie. Dongles

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

3.5mm jack is practically unbreakable. My usbc port isn't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] someone_secret@kbin.burggit.moe 5 points 10 months ago

I know that this post will probably be downvoted to hell, but I'm pretty sure no phone will return the headphone jack, ever.

You're either gonna have to quit using smartphones entirely or just have to give up on the headphone jack dream. It's never going to happen again

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago

I'm waiting for one with a good camera.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 43 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This shit should be illegal.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 16 points 10 months ago

I miss ownership of things that I paid for.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 34 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Unlock tool is unavailable at this moment but we are allowing the possibility to unlock, please stay tuned

One year later, radio silence

So it was a lie to not lose potential sales in short term while destroying credibility in long term?

[–] FrameXX@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

So it was a lie to not lose potential sales

It's sad, but only too tiny fraction of the phone buyers care about unlocking the bootloader for the company to be economically meaningful to care about.

[–] MaXimus421@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

And eventually, Google will drop this feature for the Pixel as well. You can bank on it. An unlockable bootloader adds absolutely nothing of value to these companies because it slows down year to year buying from consumers and isn't as profitable. It is from their perspective, counter productive to leave this feature enabled. So this isn't surprising in the least, tbh.

Asus and Google used it to bait enthusiasts and as soon as they established a user base they were comfortable with, they will remove it. If the phones stop selling, they will simply stop making them. It's that simple. You keeping your phone updated and feature packed for several years is not how they intend to allow the market to stray.

They want year to year sales above all else. An unlockable bootloader negates that for the majority of those who buy phones with that feature.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 3 points 10 months ago

Already dropped on pixels sold by Verizon 😒

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FutileRecipe@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

One of the many reasons I stick with Pixels. Best security combined with friendliest 3rd party OS support.

[–] keyez@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

I really wanted a zenfone 10 but purposefully avoided it hearing about the removal of the unlock tool. This is very unfortunate they are going this direction and doesn't even seem like they have a good reason or understand how this actively hurts users.

[–] 68x@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Ass-sus is still ass.

Not only are they actively blocking unlocking, they are also have shit customer service.

[–] moitoi@feddit.de 13 points 10 months ago

I was looking for a new smartphone. I'm also for many many years a custom ROM user. The last moves from multiple manufacturers nearly oblige me to get a pixel.

[–] swag_money@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

nooo one of the main reasons i got this damn phone was the unlockable bootloader :(

[–] Fredol@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

one of us should make an android phone company that makes a phone with an open source default rom, unlockable/relockable bootloader, headphone jack with a proper DAC, ir blaster, no notch or punchholes (like the note9), latest spec of USB for the port and latest Snapdragon chip

[–] Trev625@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

And front facing speakers!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tty5@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

Except in the US's version they for some reason won't let you unlock it.

Great job losing a sale Sony.

[–] Blaze@discuss.online 1 points 10 months ago

Indeed, but I guess for most pricing might be an issue

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί