this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
47 points (89.8% liked)

United Kingdom

4774 readers
55 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The paper, due to be voted on tomorrow (20 May), means Labour will ban trans women from:

❌ All-women shortlists ❌ Women's Conference ❌ Being Women's Officers

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 34 points 3 days ago

Reminder, the SC didn't rule that trans people had to be excluded from gender segregated things, only that they could. Labour doesn't have to do this, they're choosing to, and even if they did, they're the fucking government. What is the point of an elective dictatorship if the party of government is going to be so unwilling to actually change anything?

[–] SpaceShort@feddit.uk 12 points 3 days ago

Any Labour MP that doesn't rebel against this is complicit.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And I'm never voting Labour again. You mother fuckers

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's fine if there is a viable alternative in your district. If none of them align with this one stance then it's basically a non-issue.

[–] Envy@fedia.io 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hello overton window, see you're still ever encroaching rightward

[–] klu9@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 days ago

What next, Labour? Reintroduce Section 28?

[–] EdanGrey@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago