this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
381 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
3190 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Netflix is turning into cable TV::After the loss of behind-the-scenes talent and the acquisition of rights to WWE, Netflix is starting to feel more and more like basic cable.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tremble@sh.itjust.works 47 points 10 months ago

It’s easier to find ANY movie or show online than it is to actually take the time to login to netflix

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (9 children)

WWE? Lol they think that's must have TV?

5 billion for ten years? Lolol. Oh my sides. It's not even an acquisition. It's 500 million a year for fake wrestling.

[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 33 points 10 months ago (3 children)

fake wrestling

Nitpicking, but it's meant to be entertainment. You don't call HBO shows fake drama.

[–] Sloogs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

That's one of the reasons wrestling fans prefer the term scripted or staged as opposed to fake. It still requires tons of athleticism, and lots of wrestlers are still taking very real hits and injuries despite trying to minimize the impacts of them.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Pro wrestling has always been theater's weird cousin from the other side of the tracks. They're more alike than fans of either are willing to admit.

[–] AdmiralShat@programming.dev 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Do the people who go "you know that stuffs fake right?" actually think that there are people who think it's real?

[–] DadVolante@sh.itjust.works 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The best response to that is to pretend like you are just discovering that for the first time.

Explain how you believed this entire time a man could summon fire with a wave of his hand, or even come back from the dead, and that they have ruined your worldview.

When you point out how stupid the question is, makes the conversation short.

[–] maness300@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Lol, I like the way you think.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Well I can't call it wrestling, because then what would we call wrestling.

[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago

Angry grab ass time

[–] DadVolante@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

The same thing MMA calls it: catch wrestling.

They're all linked. They have an evolutionary track.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] maness300@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Some people LOVE wrestling.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

And it’s a pretty massive audience. This could officially be the end of Netflix as a movie powerhouse, but it isn’t a bad business strategy. Especially with how much they’re raking in from people paying for ads on top of the advertising dollars they’re earning from running them in the first place. They’re phasing out the cheapest ad free option. It’s a big gamble. And, honestly? Fuck ‘em if it doesn’t work. I mean, fuck ‘em if it does work too. I know I don’t personally give a shit about wrestling. (I don’t give a shit about their profits either. They’re not getting my booty. Yo-ho.)

[–] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean, as shitty as it is, there's a decent sized market for it. Probably worth it to them to overpay so much for it to hurt the current streaming provider, Peacock.

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 28 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (17 children)

I think it's ignorant to call it "shitty" or "fake wrestling".

Pro-wrestling entertainment is a form of camp theater, like drag shows. It's an old, cherished artform with a wide, passionate audience that outsiders routinely dismiss because they don't get it.

I don't watch it. It doesn't appeal to me. But I know people who love it. I think it's largely class elitism that perpetuates the misconception that this form of performance art is somehow unrespectable. It's not, it's challenging, dangerous, physically demanding theater.

Edit: For those confused or skeptical, check out Super Eyepatch Wolf's captivating media analysis "The Undertaker: Long term story telling in wrestling"

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago

Hella based take.

Attitude was the best era also

[–] kambusha@feddit.ch 2 points 10 months ago

Just like in nineteen ninety-eight when The Undertaker threw Mankind off Hell In A Cell and plummeted 16 ft through an announcer's table?

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

You understand there are other people in the world besides yourself that have different interests than you, right?

[–] turkalino@lemmy.yachts 4 points 10 months ago

You don't have to like it, but just FYI, the market doesn't care about your feelings. Professional wrestling is a worldwide phenomenon, especially in Japan, Latin America, and the Middle East.

The UFC merged with the WWE this year, and UFC fighters routinely show up to WWE events. Real professional fighters don't seem to care that it's scripted

[–] DadVolante@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Just because it's something you don't like, doesn't make it not worth an insane amount of money.

There's a reason why WWE is not only still around, but worth more today than it was in it's "heyday".

You're laughing because someone bought a proven market. It's literally the same as Marvel, Star Wars, or any other market.

That's nice you think you understand what a valuable acquisition is.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gndagreborn@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

So I was listening to a Bloomberg Tech Podcast about this. Someone from some random media group actually said "consumer demand for ad supported content over netflix's usual high production value dramas is up"

For some reason, that statement was both incredibly threatening and incredibly ominous

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

That doesn't even make sense. The high production stuff would be ad supported too.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

The whole fucking internet is, really.

[–] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Just cancelled today after not even using it for a year.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Protip: always cancel immediately after subscribing. Only resubscribe if there is something you actually wanna watch. And cancel immediately again. And so on. This way you will never pay for not using it.

[–] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Let me rephrase as I guess I was a bit unclear. I've had Netflix since 2012 but just cancelled it today after not using it for almost the entirety of 2023.

Still a great tip you've given, not trying to detract from that. That's what I do with most services but for some reason just took forever to pull the trigger on cancelling Netflix.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

For me, it’s the DRM that’s killing streaming. If I can’t put it on Discord so my wife and I can watch it while hanging out online, I’ll just pick something else or find another way to watch it.

[–] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean, can't you use something like Teleparty to sync up streams in both your browsers? Then just voice chat in Discord.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 10 points 10 months ago

Looks like that would work. Sucks to have to use an extra bit of machinery to restore a feature that they intentionally broke though. It’s like they view their customers as the enemy.

[–] anakin78z@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Huge eyeroll. There was a writers strike. To make up for all the new content that's not available, Netflix acquired a bunch of old stuff that may be new to subscribers.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 4 points 10 months ago

Old stuff was exactly why I originally subscribed to Netflix back in the day. I'm not going back to check now but I'd consider a deep well of older content to be a good thing on a streaming service.

[–] Grangle1@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

YouTubeTV and Hulu + Live TV already literally stream cable. Can't get closer to basic cable than that, lol. That said, remains to be seen whether Netflix is one of the services that survives the drastic market correction I think will happen eventually.

[–] GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 months ago

Newsflash: they all are.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Its worse than them becoming cable tv: They're BORING tv now. I imagine a large segment comes and goes when Stranger Things releases, which is a bad read. Less than a decade ago, we all saw Netflix as the second coming of HBO. Now its just bad tv.

Also I figured the rates would go up after the WWE deal, and I was right: they axed the lowest ad tier the day after.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] renrenPDX@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

We really turned full circle.

It's funny, when I was a young adult I turned my parents on to Netflix and away from cable. And now I'm trying to get them off Netflix

[–] Dehydrated@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

[–] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I fundamentally agree with the premise of the article, but did anyone else find it strange how much the writer mentioned the show Suits?

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 3 points 10 months ago

The thesis from my skim pf the article was just that Netflix is shifting from weird/experimental award bait to the sort of normie stuff you'd see on TNT, USA, or other mainstream/non-niche basic cable.

With Suits being a quintessential example of such a turn.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Netflix’s days of chasing prestige might be rapidly coming to an end with this sharp reversal of the streaming golden age replaced by something akin to Spike TV circa 2005.

“This should add some fuel to our new and growing ad business,” Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos said in an earnings call after the announcement.

But, if it doesn’t, then spending $5 billion to secure the rights for WWE Monday Night Raw for the next ten years means Netflix subscribers could see another price hike in their future — whether they like wrestling or not.

So it's got whatever this long-delayed and troubled adaptation of Avatar: The Last Airbender is, but also Young Sheldon and Suits, and a wealth of foreign language programming.

You make money spending less on it than your originals, the place you’re buying from gets to have it on their service, too, and everyone looks nice and friendly and competitive in case the FTC comes around.

Eventually, this strategy of Netflix’s — to rely on its size, content bought from other streamers, and a graveyard of prematurely canceled originals — could struggle.


The original article contains 862 words, the summary contains 185 words. Saved 79%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›