this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
336 points (93.8% liked)

Technology

58692 readers
4037 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

All these (ad)ons always take priority over performance.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] progettarsi@feddit.it 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

pls whatsapp stop copying from fucking telegram there should be a law to make it not possible this is killing competition

[–] anzo@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

But 'Stories' are from IG, owned by Meta.. so... we rather stay quiet on this occasion xdd

[–] moitoi@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

Stories are the Meta's copy of snapchat.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] WindowsEnjoyer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I stick to Telegram. I don't want anything to do with Meta.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Awesome, maybe then I can get everyone I know to switch to a better platform.

[–] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago

Yep, when Meta bought it, I warned my group friend chats that the second they start trying to monetize it, I'm going to whine until they all switch to Signal. Guess it's time to start nagging

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

This is kind of funny. Some of these features I would see see as Google's turf. However, since Google can't create a text messaging service, Meta can use their messaging app to encroach.

[–] avater@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it really depends.

If it's different parts of the same system I really don't like if it gets split up to multiple apps. Take steam, there I need two apps, one for the general store and it's functions and one for communicating with my friends. In that case I'd rather would have one app that fits all.

But if I don't need several functions of an app and they are also hurting the experience with it, I'd rather would have the sourced out to other apps.

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

The thing is, in systems like WhatsApp we don't decide what is the best for us, but WhatsApp.

Maybe integrating some features is better, maybe separation. Or maybe third way, separated things under one package (for example all-in-one packages like Nextcloud or Thunderbird).

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›