Are there seriously scientists who think AI assistants are good enough for the job?
this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
1190 points (98.1% liked)
Fuck AI
2677 readers
1159 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I use copilot at work. the predictive generation is pretty good i.e you start writing a for loop and it finishes it for you with all the variable names used correctly (most of the time). This also has the added benefit of making you name your variables clearly. the better they are the better the predicitions will be. i wouldnt trust it to do more than that though
Second this. I want it to write the code I already wanted to write anyway - but faster. I don't want it to design (hallucinate) its own code.
A friend of mine wanted to make an incremental game. I told them "hey that's a pretty good project to learn programming with" but they insisted on using an LLM. Then they proudly showed me what they got so far, it was a decent looking singular html page, but without any game logic whatsoever. Most of the code was just stylesheets - and even those had some questionable things going on lol
This has been happening for quite a while. Do you know how to work a sewing machine? Have you ever repaired your clothes? Oh well, back to Walmart.
yeah, or cooking good point, that's very worrisome
load more comments
(2 replies)
I still think that local models in places without internet are better then offline documentation.
Yeah definitely not our profit driven models.
AI can do it cheaper... so just have the AI do it. Its that simple, people really don't like it when things are so simple but can't do anything about it. So they just make shit up like this.
He still got a point, but premise is pretty ridiculous.