this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
1074 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

69702 readers
3131 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 67 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Who the fuck comes up with this stuff?

[–] captainjaneway@lemmy.blahaj.zone 65 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The most generous assumption is that they use statistics to determine correlations like this (e.g., deleted selfies resulted in a high CTR for beauty ads so they made that a part of their algo). The least generous interpretation is exactly what you're thinking: an asshole came up with it because it's logical and effective.

Either way, ethics needs to be a bigger part of the programmers education. And we, as a society, need to make algorithms more transparent (at least social media algorithms). Reddit's trending algorithm used to be open source during the good ole days.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Can you make the algorithm open source that determined it was ok for you to murder Tuvix tho

[–] captainjaneway@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 13 hours ago
if (ugly) {
    kill_child(child_name);
} else {
    ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
}
[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago

JANEWAY DID WHAT SHE HAD TO DO

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 hours ago

People who traded morals for money.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

The kind of person whose past probably includes more than a few vivisected animals.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] socphoenix@midwest.social 69 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Wonder how much of a bonus the sick fuck who pitched that got for the idea?

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 37 points 13 hours ago

Probably nothing. Most likely, a paid consultant to give ideas. And if it was a worker, they were just doing their job and at most got a "great job, keep up the good work," praise email.

[–] Drbreen@sh.itjust.works 7 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

And tiktok is supposed to be our enemy?

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 75 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Big tech is our enemy. It doesn't matter if it's facebook or tiktok.

[–] Drbreen@sh.itjust.works 9 points 14 hours ago
[–] Goretantath@lemm.ee 41 points 14 hours ago (2 children)
[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 13 hours ago

both ARE enemies.

[–] Drbreen@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago

I agree. I'm addressing the obvious hypocrisy of big tech

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 14 points 14 hours ago

Por que no los dos?

[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 13 hours ago

TikTok absolutely does the same kind of thing and worse. Engagement is all that matters. Doesn't matter what kind, what about, or how that engagement is generated.

[–] Headofthebored@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm very skeptical that the Chinese government having your data as an American is worse than the American government and corporations (you know, the people with applicable jurisdiction) having it. Seems more likely to me that American interests just weren't happy about a huge platform of Americans not being under their umbrella of control and censorship. Sure, you could argue that China of course has their own, but the two wouldn't completely overlap, so there were windows where things could be freely and organically discussed and organized by Americans, without American government and corporate interference. Obviously that couldn't be allowed to stand.

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

That's very nice and cute that you're skeptical, but they're literally doing the same thing, except with a goal of weakening America instead generating more money.

Your skepticism doesn't matter- it's an attack on you, stop excusing it.

[–] Drbreen@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago

Yes there definitely would be an alterior agenda to the reasons for the push to hate on tiktok data fears. But that's not to say that people are any safer (data wise) with US big tech.

[–] admin@lemmy.today 4 points 13 hours ago

How did they come up with this idea? Did the algorithm suggest this pattern, or did someone in marketing come up with it?

[–] SaladKing@lemm.ee 3 points 13 hours ago

Fucking hell. That is vile!

[–] 20cello@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›