this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
785 points (98.8% liked)

Funny

9459 readers
1461 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago
[–] Uebercomplicated@lemmy.ml 31 points 6 days ago

This is very real and has been an issue for years. I remember when I was younger, watching public TV, and I saw a news report about an elderly lady who was forced to sell her home along with the rest of her village so that they could dig up the entire area for coal. At the time it was a big deal, because she took so long to agree, which got media attention. It was incredibly depressing. It felt dystopian.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 29 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It is an engineering marvel, indeed, as it is the biggest mobile machine of the world.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Silic0n_Alph4@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Ahh, you just beat me to it!

[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Bagger 288 (and its sibling, Bagger 293) are probably the biggest machines which move freely on soil. They're about 225 m long, 96 meters tall and weigh 14 200 tons.

In the length category, the F60 overburden conveyor bridge (which moves on rails) is (was?) several times bigger, at 502 m length. It weighed less, however, at 13,600 tons.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 37 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Alternatively, build a flying machine with TNT duplicators

[–] janus2@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 6 days ago

[ilmango intro music] 🥭🥭🥭

[–] dumbass@leminal.space 4 points 6 days ago

Like Docm's world eater from HermitCraft season 9.

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 21 points 6 days ago

every rational part of my brain fighting the 7 year old me inside me who knows Bagger 288 is the coolest thing ever

[–] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 9 points 6 days ago

I love how I know the name Bagger 288 because of a 16 year old meme

load more comments
view more: next ›