Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.
Rules:
-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --
-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --
-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --
-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --
-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--
-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--
-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --
-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --
"Neutrality" is such a bullshit term. The point of juries is to be representative of the people's moral sentiment, not to be a collection of morons who knows nothing about the world around them and safe unable to form opinions of their own.
It simply seems like normal people think Luigi took out a very evil man.
They want the death penalty because a death-qualified jury means it's going to have a bunch of reactionaries.
A death qualified jury cannot have jurors on it that disagree with the death penalty morally.
In practice, instead of being judged by your peers it's a bunch of people selected so that they like harsh punishments.
That's what I learned when I posted my video to r/TrueAnon.
I hadn't thought of that really, that is fucked. Most reasonable people I know are opposed to the death penalty, so that does seem pretty effective for biasing the jury. But maybe they will get some that are like "of course I love the death penalty, that's what Luigi doled out and it was well deserved. Not guilty."
Ironically even given that, people are less likely to be convicted when the death penalty is on the table, because people feel bad sentencing someone to death, even if they agree with it.
If we took jury representation seriously, every jury would be a randomly-selected representative example of the population, jury duty would be remunerated very well and there would be stuff like childcare for jurors in place, hell you shouldn't even need to spend gas to get to the courthouse the court should send a van to pick you up and feed you three hots while you're there.
Instead we've got a system where one of the best ways not to get picked is to show up to the court wearing glasses and reading a book while you're waiting because lawyers will see that, assume you're smart, and motion to get you removed from the jury pool.
sounds like it's quite easy to find a neutral jury (hating insurance companies is a neutral opinion) but what they're really trying to do is find a biased one
We can't find 12 people who hold a neutral opinion on blood sucking leeches who feast on them and their families.
It is important, when being selected for a jury, to lie and say that you like health insurance companies.
“Neutral” is an interesting term to use to describe a minority opinion. Sounds like you’re actually trying to find an incredibly biased jury
How tf are they unable to find 10 rich assholes in NYC?
The defense would have to approve the jurors too. Most of New Yorkers are not rich and are progressive.
Those are the kinda people who never do jury duty
Why can’t we find a neutral jury for the murder of mecha-Hitler?
I see nothing wrong with this.
You would think something impacting so many people negatively would be seen as an assault on all the citizens. If only we had less greedy ceos and shareholders making ludicrous amounts of money, and more people trying to make things better for everyone.
They're just going to kill him
