gasp millions?! They're done for now!
Buy European
Overview:
The community to discuss buying European goods and services.
Rules:
-
Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.
-
Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:
-
Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.
-
No russian suggestions.
Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:
- No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia
- No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies
- No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users
- Do not share intentionally false or misleading information
- Do not spam or abuse network features.
- Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
- No generative AI content
Benefits of Buying Local:
local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.
European Instances
Lemmy:
-
Basque Country: https://lemmy.eus/
-
๐ง๐ช Belgium: https://0d.gs/
-
๐ง๐ฌ Bulgaria: https://feddit.bg/
-
Catalonia: https://lemmy.cat/
-
๐ฉ๐ฐ Denmark, including Greenland (for now): https://feddit.dk/
-
๐ช๐บ Europe: https://europe.pub/
-
๐ซ๐ท๐ง๐ช๐จ๐ญ France, Belgium, Switzerland: https://jlai.lu/
-
๐ฉ๐ช๐ฆ๐น๐จ๐ญ๐ฑ๐ฎ Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Lichtenstein: https://feddit.org/
-
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland: https://sopuli.xyz/ & https://suppo.fi/
-
๐ฎ๐ธ Iceland: https://feddit.is/
-
๐ฎ๐น Italy: https://feddit.it/
-
๐ฑ๐น Lithuania: https://group.lt/
-
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands: https://feddit.nl/
-
๐ต๐ฑ Poland: https://fedit.pl/ & https://szmer.info/
-
๐ต๐น Portugal: https://lemmy.pt/
-
๐ธ๐ฎ Slovenia: https://gregtech.eu/
-
๐ธ๐ช Sweden: https://feddit.nu/
-
๐น๐ท Turkey: https://lemmy.com.tr/
-
๐ฌ๐ง UK: https://feddit.uk/
Matrix:
-
๐ฌ๐ง UK: matrix.org & glasgow.social
-
๐ซ๐ท France: tendomium & imagisphe.re & hadoly.fr
-
๐ฉ๐ช Germany: tchncs.de, catgirl.cloud, pub.solar, yatrix.org, digitalprivacy.diy, oblak.be, nope.chat, envs.net, hot-chilli.im, synod.im & rollenspiel.chat
-
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands: bark.lgbt
-
๐ฆ๐น Austria: gemeinsam.jetzt & private.coffee
-
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland: pikaviestin.fi
Related Communities:
Buy Local:
Continents:
European:
Buying and Selling:
Boycott:
Countries:
Companies:
Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:
Banner credits: BYTEAlliance
500 million euro for apple and 200 million for meta
Metaโs chief global affairs officer Joel Kaplan accused the Commission of trying to โhandicap successful American businesses while allowing Chinese and European companies to operate under different standards
We all see where this is going, right? Anti-competitive behaviour now being framed as โUSA #1โ patriotism and actively defended by MAGA via tariffs and trade policy.
People outside the US need to stop using American platforms.
Drop in the bucket
Actually, this was news was posted earlier today (here) and someone commented the following:
EU fines generally have a bad track record when it comes to stopping companies from trying to get away with stuff, but they do have an excellent track record when it comes to making them stop.
Differently put: You won't see the EU levy another fine against Apple for this because Apple doesn't fancy getting slapped with a 40bn fine. If your main armament is big enough all you'll ever need is shots before the bow.
Can't say for sure it is true, but if it is it would definitely have a serious effect.
I don't understand. "It doesn't make them stop, but it makes them stop?" Where are these $40 BN fines?
Maybe i should have copy and pasted their follow-up comment as well:
Well, it's sufficient. Using larger calibres for the opening salvo would increase the risk of companies succeeding in fighting fines before court, and companies generally have some kind of creative interpretation of the law at the ready to justify what they're doing. Fining companies into bankruptcy or out of competition for a first offence is rather hard to justify, for repeat offenders, though? Companies continuing their behaviour after having received a warning fine have no excuse, now the gloves come off otherwise you're perceived as a paper tiger.
I think their point is that giving a small fine the first time is enough reason for them to change their behaviour because they know they could get a much higher fine (for example $40 Bn). I don't know how true this is, didn't research it, but it sounds plausible.
That's pretty much it. At first you get slapped on the wrist and if you just treat it as a cost of doing business without any changes you'll soon find out that it's not a one time fee, nor that it stays the same. I think with GPDR the maximum (one time) fee was up to 10% of companys turnover (not gross profit). With Apples ~390 billion revenue that would roughly round up to 40 billion per fine.
And even if you have endless supply of money there's still options to shut the whole business down if it's deemed illegal. It might be a damn slow process, but if you just stubbornly try to fight it with lawyers and money it just doesn't work.
And yet we keep seeing the same headlines over and over. Maybe putting one's head on a pike would be a more effective deterrent - it's worth a shot.
The heads are outside the EU's jurisdiction. But I would like to see the EU showing it has the power to limit a company's activities on the common market if they do not follow the rules (idk how exactly, I guess hard bans would be very, very difficult to implement in this case).
Or maybe just one of those ~~$4~~ $40 BN fines
Meta already has racked up nearly $2bn worth of fines
โฌ1.2bn 2023 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-65669839
This one โฌ200m https://www.cbsnews.com/news/eu-fine-apple-meta-breach-digital-markets-act-dma/
โฌ800m in 2024 https://apnews.com/article/meta-facebook-european-union-competition-fine-6886192353a344126a15886d6ca7c627
And Google got โฌ5bn in 2018
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/eu-fine-apple-meta-breach-digital-markets-act-dma/
Mistyped, meant $40 BN as stated earlier in this comment chain.
Millions for companies worth TRILLIONS is like fining ordinary people a few pennies.
If the fine doesn't HURT, then it's not going to be effective.
Corporations should be fined at least the value of 50% of the profits from the timeframe they were committing those crimes. If they've been breaking the law for years, then the fine will likely be tens or hundreds of billions of dollars.
If the law doesn't compel these companies to act ethically, they simply won't.