this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
20 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3650 readers
308 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
tom@feddit.uk
GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
flamingos@feddit.uk
frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
20
Nigel Farage thinks net zero is the new Brexit. Starmer can prove him wrong (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by SleafordMod@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This opinion article argues that Labour should support green policies for moral reasons, but the author also argues that Farage's anti-green message is not what the public want. Apparently "68% of Farage’s constituents in Clacton-on-Sea, Essex, declared themselves 'somewhat' or 'very' worried" about climate change.

The article links to this Bluesky thread from a pollster which is interesting:

A screenshot of a Bluesky thread which is linked above

Edit: you can right click the above image and open it in a new tab to see it full size.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrPoletki@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But it is the next brexit.

Dropping Net zero targets and the tech development behind it will fuck this country over massively just like how leaving the EU has.

I doubt it will be as bad as leaving the EU, but it could be.

Farages futures is one where Britain pays everyone else, instead of us, to use the technology they developed to combat emisstions, get extra EV range etc etc.

We have a simple choice with net zero, we can try and be the ones that sells everyone else the solutions they need to stop destroying the planet, or we could be the one that bankrupts ourselves buying those (arguable inferior too) solutions off everyone else.

[–] MrPoletki@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

totally forgot I already commented on this post, saying almost the same thing...

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

Farage is opposed to net zero because it will make us less reliant on imported fossil fuels. Reduced global demand for fossil fuels is very bad for Russia's balance of trade.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I guess with Labour doing a decent reduction of mass immigration, Reform needs to be ready to spin up a second populist warfront.

Farage will have no trouble getting funding for his anti-environment nonsense, but the UK public will be harder to convince than they were for reducing immigration.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The Brexit guy is saying something is the next Brexit, to describe it as some kind of an unforced error, and a looming catastrophe.

I think I need a lie down.

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what suggests Starmer is in any way interested in proving Nigel Farage wrong about anything. It seems like he's quite happy to run with whatever narrative the right sets.

[–] SleafordMod@feddit.uk 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My guess is that Labour have done some polling, showing them what red wall voters want, and Labour want to appeal to those voters - voters who are tempted by Reform's message.

But on this climate change issue, the article is saying that voters don't even want anti-green policies. And I haven't seen signs that Labour are tempted to copy Reform's anti-green stance.

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Maybe so but at some point Trump is going to tell Starmer to jump on climate change.

[–] SpaceShort@feddit.uk 1 points 8 hours ago

Or his donors.

[–] MrPoletki@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And anyone with any balls would tell that fat orange fuck to go fuck himself.

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately our glorious PM only does that to people advocating for changes which might risk benefiting working people.

[–] baggins@beehaw.org 4 points 3 days ago

I really hope Starmer has the balls to tell Trump to do one.

We just cannot trust USA any more. They'd sell us down the river in a heartbeat.

[–] MrPoletki@feddit.uk 10 points 3 days ago

We're rapidly letting it slip through our hands because of these right wing idiots, but net zero could (have) potentially be(en) the UK's new Industrial revolution. Except this time we lead the way in saving the planet instead of destroying it.

Fusion power is the future. Excessive renewable power is the future. High tech energy storage is the future.

Not because I want it to be, because that's just how it's going to be

We can either be technological leaders in these areas, or we can be buying everyone else's solutions instead of selling our own.

[–] DrCake@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I feel like focusing on the opinion polls at this minute is wrong. Reform will force this to be an issue and push climate skeptic propaganda heavily. Given 4 years of that, I can see the publics opinion shifting.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

climate skeptic propaganda

Skeptics are people who don't believe things until they see facts. Denying climate change requires the rejection of overwhelming facts. That's not skepticism, it's wilful stupidity.