this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
54 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13789 readers
748 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Explainer: Can Trump fire Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell? - theguardian.com

Can Trump legally fire the Fed chair?

The clearest answer: right now, probably not, but things could change.

On Wednesday, Powell affirmed that the Fed’s independence “is a matter of law”. “We’re not removable except for cause,” Powell said. “Fed independence has pretty broad support across both political parties and on both sides of the hill.” But he also mentioned a case going through the supreme court that may alter the power the president has over federal agencies, going off Trump firing an official with the National Labor Relations Board.

It’s unclear how the court will rule, but it allowed the firings to stand, overruling a lower court. “I don’t think that that decision will apply to the Fed, but I don’t know,” Powell said. “It’s a situation that we’re monitoring carefully.” The Fed’s next board meeting is on 6 and 7 May. Trump is likely trying to pressure the Fed ahead of it, but it is unlikely that officials will budge.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 29 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Depends on your definition of legal, but yes he's not a democrat pretending to be straightjacketed by 'norms' and 'civility',

He absolutely can use the power of the most powerful political office on earth to remove Powell

[–] Dimmer06@hexbear.net 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The clearest answer: right now, probably not, but things could change.

This is not accurate. Gwynne Wilcox was fired from the NLRB and while the courts are deciding whether or not Trump had the legal authority to do that she remains de facto not a member of the board. If Trump were to fire Powell there is no reason to think he would be allowed to remain chair while litigating the matter. The courts have already decided that the burden is on the former officials to prove Trump cannot fire them, not the other way around.

[–] Parzivus@hexbear.net 18 points 4 days ago

The Supreme Court can unanimously order Trump to do something and he just ignores them. I don't know why some people still think that the law is going to stop him

[–] buh@hexbear.net 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He’s gonna revoke Jerome’s citizenship and deport him to el salvador

[–] peeonyou@hexbear.net 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

i could get behind this, but just this once

[–] MaxOS@hexbear.net 15 points 4 days ago

If trump can kill the pope he can fire the fed chair

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 13 points 4 days ago

I dunno but it would be funny

“We’re not removable except for cause,” Powell said

trump: the cause is that i said so

[–] HelluvaBottomCarter@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago

All these news outlets keep reporting about how Trump might fire JPow. It's almost like they're trying to lathe it into happening.

[–] MaxOS@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

another L for betteridge's law of headlines

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I don't understand what you mean.

The clearest answer: right now, probably not, but things could change.

I think it's very likely the 6 GOP justices will give him the power.

[–] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The "law" in question is that any headline posed as a question can be answered "No"

Thus, because it's "another L", that means that this headline cannot be answered No, because as you said, it doesn't matter if it's legal or not, he'll just do it and drag it on in the courts for as long as he can.

[–] MaxOS@hexbear.net 6 points 4 days ago

I was just joking that betteridge's law of headlines does not apply here because trump probably can fire the fed chair and nobody will stop him

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The clearest answer: right now, probably not, but things could change.

As usual - we are at the mercy of the GOP justices. I bet they give him the power.

[–] Des@hexbear.net 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

i think it's 50/50. he's fucking with the money, and in ways even the ultra-wealthy can't really take advantage of with insider trading

that ruling would basically be a "completely destroy the U.S. aligned order/economic system and dollar please daddy" ticket.

and while I have zero faith in U.S. institutions, I do think the sheer erratic way he is doing things is starting to disturb even his closest allies.

like, he literally could have done all this shit in a slightly more controlled demolition and made his buddies stinking rich but he's just incapable of such things

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

he literally could have done all this shit in a slightly more controlled demolition and made his buddies stinking rich but he's just incapable of such things

I wonder how many republicans literally pray every single day that Trump dies and Vance takes over.

[–] Des@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure many do but they need to retune the direction of the winds of magic for their prayers because they accidentally hit the Pope

CIA is still calibrating the Thoughts And Prayers gun

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago

I don't think Vance is any better, but he's more controllable than Trump is.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not that much left after fed falls.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 4 days ago

amazing how much libs love Powell.

He helped keep inflation down...which as a byproduct we're happily ignoring killed wage growth as labor got power and worked to keep people from being able to avoid housing by raising loan rates

[–] GoodGuyWithACat@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago

Constitutionally I think he should be impeached by Congress, right? I know that it doesn't really matter.