this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
67 points (100.0% liked)

news

23979 readers
771 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

spoilerThe US will abandon trying to broker a Russia-Ukraine peace deal within days unless there are clear signs a truce can be reached, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has warned.

"We're not going to continue with this endeavour for weeks and months on end," Rubio said, adding that the US had "other priorities to focus on".

Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and has placed a number of conditions on any potential ceasefire.

Despite the Trump administration's initial confidence that it could secure a deal quickly, attempts to reach a full ceasefire have yet to materialise, with Washington blaming both sides.

Following a meeting with European leaders in Paris about a potential ceasefire on Thursday, Rubio told reporters on Friday: "We need to determine very quickly now - and I'm talking about a matter of days - whether or not this is doable."

"If it's not going to happen, then we're just going to move on," he said about truce talks.

He said it was clear that a peace deal would be difficult to strike but there needed to be signs it could be done soon.

US President Donald Trump had said before he re-entered office that he would stop the fighting in the first 24 hours of his presidency.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, when asked to respond to Trump saying he expected an answer from Russia on a ceasefire, said "the negotiations taking place are quite difficult".

"The Russian side is striving to reach a peace settlement in this conflict, to ensure its own interests, and is open to dialogue," he said.

The comments come as Russian strikes on Ukraine continue. On Friday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in a post on X that Russia had launched a volley of missile attacks that killed two people.

During a meeting with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni in Rome on Friday, US Vice President JD Vance said he was "optimistic" about ending the Ukraine war.

"I want to update the prime minister on some of the negotiations between Russia, Ukraine, and also some of the things that have happened even in the past 24 hours," he said.

"I won't prejudge them, but we do feel optimistic that we can hopefully bring this war - this very brutal war - to a close."

Rubio's warning follows separate news that Ukraine and the US took the first step towards striking a minerals deal, after an initial agreement was derailed when a February meeting between Trump and Zelensky erupted into a public shouting match.

On Thursday, the two countries signed a memorandum of intent stating that they intend to establish an investment fund for Ukraine's reconstruction as part of an economic partnership agreement.

The aim is to finalise the deal by 26 April, the memo published by the Ukrainian government says.

The details of any deal remain unclear. Previous leaks have suggested the agreement has been extended beyond minerals to control of Ukraine's energy infrastructure, as well as its oil and gas.

Ukrainian negotiators have tried to resist Trump's demands that a joint investment fund would pay back the US for previous military aid, but have seemingly accepted his claim that it would help the country recover after the war ends.

The memo said the "American people desire to invest alongside the Ukrainian people in a free, sovereign and secure Ukraine".

Zelensky had been hoping to use the deal to secure a US security guarantee in the event of a ceasefire deal, telling European leaders last month that "a ceasefire without security guarantees is dangerous for Ukraine".

The US has so far resisted providing Kyiv with security guarantees.

The White House argues the mere presence of US businesses would put off Russia from further aggression, but that did not exactly work when they invaded in 2022.

Economy Minister Yulia Svyrydenko announced the signing of the memorandum on X, with pictures of Svyrydenko and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent separately signing the document over an online call.

"There is a lot to do, but the current pace and significant progress give reason to expect that the document will be very beneficial for both countries," Svyrydenko wrote.

Bessent said the details were still being worked out but the deal is "substantially what we'd agreed on previously."

Trump hinted at the deal during a press conference with Italian leader Giorgia Meloni, saying "we have a minerals deal which I guess is going to be signed on (next) Thursday...And I assume they're going to live up to the deal. So we'll see. But we have a deal on that."

Ivanna Klympush-Tsintsadze, an MP and the chair of Ukraine's parliamentary committee on EU Integration, told the BBC the Ukrainian Parliament will have "the last word" in the deal.

She added: "I hope that there will be enough reasoning to ensure that whatever is signed, and if it is going to be ratified that it is in the interest of our country and our people.

The memo release comes as a 30-day moratorium on striking Ukrainian energy infrastructure ordered by Russian President Vladimir Putin expires.

Peskov said Putin had not yet issued any new orders regarding the temporary ceasefire.

On Thursday, Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha met Rubio and Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff in Paris to discuss how to end the war.

Sybiha said they had "discussed the paths to a fair and lasting peace, including full ceasefire, multinational contingent, and security guarantees for Ukraine".

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] edge@hexbear.net 27 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The US is probably demanding something completely unacceptable to Russia like the European "peacekeeping" forces in Ukraine they've been talking about.

I don't know where that idea came from or why anyone thought it would be accepted (if they did think that). It just completely defeats the whole point of the war to keep NATO forces out of Ukraine.

I guess Trump doesn't actually want a deal that badly if that's the case. That or his people are telling him Putin is being the unreasonable one without giving him any detail on what Putin is rejecting.

[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 20 points 4 days ago

Not to sound like a Trump supporter but I wish Trump would handle these discussions alone and directly with Putin.

They'd reach a deal quickly. Get Rubio and these other dumbasses out of there, they're probably messing it up with all their agendas and demands. Trump probably doesn't give a fuck about a peace keeping force or NATO ot whatever else, he probably just wants some raw materials and would trade Kiev for them in a second if he could.

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

i think not usa, but ukraine doesn't want to. As russians decided on some not touching z-man losing strat, it's impossible to unblock ukraine political process in any way, they are just little dictatorship of the president, with no other opinions allowed in public sphere.

[–] edge@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Ukraine doesn’t get much say though. If the US and Russia come to a deal, the US can just stop sending weapons and intelligence and Ukraine won’t last too long. Their little Kursk adventure fell apart in like a week when Trump paused support.

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 4 points 4 days ago

it was falling apart for months.

nah, they only way they "fall" is another "revolution", or some oligarch (or russia) deciding enuff is enuff and getting zelensky, or army collapse (still seems unlikely to me by eyeballing, they only need drones and russia not figuring out auto-cannons before them, or russia suddenly making three big offensives on scale of last year (also seems unlikely)), until these things this war can last for another 3-5 years.

[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 8 points 4 days ago

I always figured that because of people like Rubio and other neo-cons who whisper in Trump's ear and appeal to his sense not to look "weak" and like a "total loser" that Russia would never get an actual deal with the US and that they probably know this but are using it to 1) try anyways and 2) keep the tension down and make as much progress as possible in the war-front as once this collapses it's possible that one of the reactions of the Trump admin is sending even more weapons to Ukraine to try to punish Russia 3) to prevent more sanctions and economic warfare which Trump loves and will likely go to if the Russians don't bend the knee.

So the real question is how bad do things get? Does Trump just push through the minerals deal and then walk away after slapping a few more sanctions and thievery on Russia and let Ukraine collapse? Or does he decide he needs to "secure" the minerals and do the unthinkable and either start arming Ukraine again as fast as they can and perhaps escalating or even worse put US troops or NATO troops in to "guard" the resources. I do think he's somewhat afraid of nuclear war unlike a lot of the ghouls he surrounds himself with so US troops seems less likely though I think he'll use maximum economic pressure and warfare on Russia.