this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
53 points (96.5% liked)

Green Energy

2699 readers
194 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

"No quick wins" is some weird editorializing OP. That phrase is nowhere in the article. The closest thing to it is that China managed this breakthrough due to "strategic stamina," i.e it took time to make this work. Since thorium reactors were proposed in the late 90s and this is the first that appears commercislly viable, that is literally true.

Overall, this is a huge accomplishment, especially if China is willing to share the design. Even if they aren't, this should dramatically ramp down China's fossil fuel usage over the next couple of decades, so its still a win for the rest of us.

[–] higgsboson@dubvee.org 21 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

The phrase 'No quick wins' is, however, found in the webpage title when I load the page in Firefox. It is embedded in the page meta properties. OP probably used a "suggest title" feature in their client. Load it up and see for yourself.

html>head>meta

<meta property="og:title" content"'No quick wins':China has the world's first operational thorium nuclear reactor" data-next-head="">

The article title and webpage title being out of sync implies to me a changed headline, with the webpage title being the original. Or maybe it is intentional to provide aggregators with a different title.

[–] luciole@beehaw.org 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

The tag is:

meta property="og:title" content="‘No quick wins’: China has the world’s first operational thorium nuclear reactor"

An og:title meta tag basically means "hey, if someone posts this on their social media, use this as the title".

So yeah OP is off the hook bee wink emoji.

[–] paperBark@slrpnk.net 8 points 6 days ago

Interesting, so they change the narrative when its posted on social media apps vs on the web...

[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 days ago

"No quick wins" was in the original title of the article. SCMP often change their title within a few hours of releasing an article.

If you link the article as a post, that's still the title Lemmy automatically recommends.

[–] solo@slrpnk.net 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I found the following article from 2019 that contradicts several claims in this article (archive link). I am not familiar with this tech, so if anyone of you is, could you share your thoughts?

Fact-check: Five claims about thorium made by Andrew Yang

[–] sqgl@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago

Bear in mind that this is from the nuclear energy industry with a bias such as claiming nuclear is necessary for net zero carbon emissions by 2049 (ignoring pumped hydro storage of renewable energy).