this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
31 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37690 readers
250 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

April 15 (Reuters) - Nvidia (NVDA.O) on Tuesday said it would take $5.5 billion in charges after the U.S. government limited exports of its H20 artificial intelligence chip to China, a key market for one of its most popular chips.

Nvidia's AI chips have been a key focus of U.S. export controls as U.S. officials have moved to keep the most advanced chips from being sold to China as the U.S. tries to keep ahead in the AI race. After those controls were implemented, Nvidia began designing chips that would come as close as possible to U.S. limits.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Do they honestly believe that China is not capable of producing their own chips for cheaper if Nvidia stops supply? This is moronic

[–] gjoel@programming.dev 16 points 1 week ago

USA buys too much from China compared to how much they export. Restricts exports to China. Truly genius!

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 week ago

AI bros voted for Trump and got this as a prize. Woohoo, chuds.

[–] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I am not even sure what the US government expects to achieve by limiting them at this point. I could see it being used for negotiating with China on trade, but these guys are inherently not capable of any of that.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is classic underdevelopment, like how Europe and the US deliberately withheld vital equipment and machinery from Africa to prevent them from building their own industrial base.

It's obviously way too late for this tactic to make any sense, though. China can't be underdeveloped, they're becoming a tech leader at this point.