We also defederate from other instances from time to time due to lack of moderation and unreachable admins among other reasons.
So feddit.de soon?
This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.
For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.
Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.
If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.
If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us
We also defederate from other instances from time to time due to lack of moderation and unreachable admins among other reasons.
So feddit.de soon?
Thanks for all the work you do. Is there a place we can make feature requests? I donβt want to clutter this thread if this isnβt the right place
Depends on the type of feature request.
For most feature requests the project issue trackers are likely the best place.
Alternative UIs and apps have their own issue trackers as well.
If it's something that's just about configuration or something we have built ourselves !support@lemmy.world can be a good place for that.
Feel free to reply here though and I can tell you where it's best placed.
Thanks for pointing me in the right direction(s). To summarize my request: Iβd love to have a way to bundle multiple communities into a single section or feed in order to focus on a specific topic (and take breaks fromβ¦ others). The obvious parallel from Reddit is a MultiReddit. For examples of how I use them:
I see this as one of the most useful and even powerful features of a community-based system like Lemmy. Would love to have this option here
you'll want to follow https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/818 for that
Ah thank you. In fact now that I look at that, turns out I already commented on that issue in support. Heh
Not from lemmy.world, but you seem like very competent admins. Hats off to you!
Thank you for your tireless work in keeping this place running and thus providing me with a steady supply of new content so I don't have to resort to more drastic measures like reading a book or going outside.
Hahah, I was expecting more drastic measures to be "like Reddit or Facebook". Well said, and agreed.
Thank you admins for your diligence when it comes to things like this (esp in regards to CSAM).
I've got to say, I haven't had a place on the internet quite like lemmy since the message boards of the 90s. This reminds me of one of the ones that somehow kept out the trolls.
Not from .world, but I thought Iβd put in my .02 about Lemmy.one.
For the first few months after joining Lemmy, I bounced around signing up on several different instances looking for a place that felt like βhomeβ. I liked the simple, straightforward name of Lemmy.one, so I tried to sign up there. I got a message that said my registration required authorization. I waited a few days and didnβt get anything, so I messaged the mod, Jonah. I got no reply, so I waited some more, and tried to message him again with no response. I did some digging and found a couple of other email addresses of his outside of Lemmy. I sent emails to those addresses, and to this day, almost a year and a half later, I never got authorization on Lemmy.one nor did I ever get any response in any way from Jonah.
I found a relatively local instance for me with a name I love and great, responsive mods, so it worked out for the best as Iβm super happy.
Nice that you found your instance. Its just sad to see instances go offline without any trace ( or unresponsive )
Given the apparent abundance of ADHD types on forum sites like lemmy, instances springing up and soon going dark seems pretty normal really.
Thank you for keeping the lights on.
Nice update, thank you for enabling parallel federation!
Tesseract looks nice!
Tried it... I find it too "busy"... "cluttered" might be a better description. π€·ββοΈ
Prefer the current front-end myself.
Can I try it as a user or do I have to deploy it myself?
The link is up there in the post for you to use.
Ah, thanks & sorry. I only saw the GitHub one somehow.
In the early days of my use of Lemmy, I considered hosting an instance myself. Iβm glad that I didnβt because it seems like a lot more work than I thought it would be.
Thanks for the work that you do for us all.
Cloudflare does not automatically report to the NCMEC anymore.
they do, they just don't require you to be registered with them anymore for their csam scanner:
They do not. Hereβs the email I got (I maintain programming.dev).
The screenshot in my previous comment is directly from their abuse form at https://abuse.cloudflare.com/csam. Your email is specifically about their proactive scanner, not about abuse reports that are submitted.
They also explicitly state on their website that they forward any received CSAM reports to NCMEC:
Abuse reports filed under the CSAM category are treated as the highest priority for our Trust & Safety team and moved to the front of the abuse response queue. Whenever we receive such a report, generally within minutes regardless of time of day or day of the week, we forward the report to NCMEC, as well as to the hosting provider and/or website operator, along with some additional information to help them locate the content quickly.
I see, you're talking about manual reporting (as in you filed a report directly on CF's website) rather than CF's CSAM scanning. This is the same as reporting CSAM to any US service provider.
We have enabled 2 parallel sends around a week ago
Ah, I was wondering what changed (for the better). My instance would randomly fall behind by somewhere between 2,000 and 20,000, and I'd have to temporarily shunt LW traffic over to the buffer server until it caught up. Noticed that hadn't been a problem for about a week, and that explains it.
Awesome, glad to see we've updated to the new Lemmy-UI features, the banned badges and vote-view for moderators in Lemmy-UI will be a great improvement (for people worried that mods can now view votes, they always could via the API since 0.19.4, this is only a Lemmy-UI change).
β
While we havenβt updated our backend to a newer version yet, as we still have to find a solution for dealing with the newly integrated functionality to send emails on rejected registration applications
I'm curious why this is an issue, could you maybe please elaborate? I thought this was generally a good change since it increases transparency of moderation and lets people know if and when they were denied, and potentially for what reason too. Good to know in case they made a mistake or would like to appeal.
we currently have our own solution to send emails with a custom text explaining why people were rejected and what they can do next. we'll have to review whether the built-in solution would be capable of replacing this functionality adequately if we add rejection reasons to lemmy when rejecting the applications.
our current solution rejects applications and then deletes the user from the database to ensure that they can sign up again if they want, as denied applications only get deleted after a week or so and an appeal process would require support tickets and a lot more time to be spent by us on addressing those.
our application process is fully automatic and just depends on certain words to be provided and the email not being disposable.
I see, that makes sense.
I'm stunned about Lemmy.one That was my first instance, stunning that they are unmoderated.