this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
1389 points (98.1% liked)

Mildly Interesting

19713 readers
1209 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The idea feels like sci-fi because you're so used to it, imagining ads gone feels like asking to outlaw gravity. But humanity had been free of current forms of advertising for 99.9% of its existence. Word-of-mouth and community networks worked just fine. First-party websites and online communities would now improve on that.

The traditional argument pro-advertising—that it provides consumers with necessary information—hasn't been valid for decades.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've always thought of it as waste of our mental resources. But pollution describes it even better.

Pollution specifically engineered by psychologists to maximize its impact.

[–] Christobootswiththepher@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Emotional pollution Mind pollution SOUL POLLUTION

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] midori_matcha@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"THE JOY OF NOT BEING SOLD ANYTHING"

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 day ago

Freedom from mind flaying (advertising) !

[–] sfu@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Los Angeles county vs Orange county.

LA allows billboards, OC doesn't. It just feels so much cleaner and like a breath of fresh air as you drive from LA into OC.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Advertising is illegal in São Paulo. At least, outdoor advertising is illegal.

No ads

Look closely -- what don't you see?

[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well obviously, we all know birds aren't real

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I would like meaningful regulation on advertising. Something to the effect of "STOP BLASTING MY FACE WITH ADS EVERY CHANCE YOU GET YOU SCUMFUCKERS"

There is a gas station nearby who runs non-stop unmutable ads. I don't go to that gas station anymore.

[–] sfu@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I HATE when I am forced to watch commercials, in front of my face on the gas pump, while I am pumping gas into my vehicle. I should really get a discount on my gas for that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 49 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Advertising needs to become as socially acceptable as smoking.

It arbitrary pollutes any environment it’s conducted in, and causes secondary harms to non-participants by incentivising insecure hoarding of private information with the intent to better target individuals.

load more comments (2 replies)

I concur.

Some places limit advertising more than others. Banned on footpaths and dangerous spots. What about sales persons? How do you brand a product? I think it would have to be well defined.

I am ok with technical information being provided by a staff member. So much shit is peddled through marketing. As the scientist designing the product, I want to tell them the truth, customers love the truth, in this regard. I think banning deception and conning further would be a good way. And fuck this debt model of economics. And how about universities turn back into noble education organisations, not cocksucking psuedo-businesses.

I think govts/politicians like keeping the vague open because they use it, too. Their propaganda departments are cucked with good fact checking teams.

[–] kruddman@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ads should be paying me for using my bandwidth.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 day ago
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh what a world. But it would NEVER happen. Might as well wish for super powers.

[–] okamiueru@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Certain types of advertising is illegal where I'm from. In particular: political adverts of any kind, and ads that target children.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Susurrus@lemm.ee 21 points 1 day ago

Personally I've been of the opinion that advertising, at least in its current form, should be illegal since I was about 15. I'm not 100% sure if it should be completely illegal, or just very heavily regulated. Even after all those years, I'm still baffled nearly every day that people around me seem okay with current advertising.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 47 points 1 day ago (6 children)

That'd be great, but the "how" is a much harder question. What counts as advertising? Because there's a reason Google, Meta, etc. have their fingers in so many different industries: every single thing that gets attention could be leveraged for advertising, even the act of suppressing mentions of competitors.

Should I be able to say "X product has been great, I recommend it!" Only if I'm not being paid, you say? How could you possibly know?

As discussed in the article, "propaganda" is illegal. So any discussion about how terrible trump is would also be illegal. Propaganda doesn't mean false, it just means it's trying to convince you of something. An advertisement. Heck, the article itself could be considered a form of advertising for legislation.

It's just so trivial of a concept to say, but the moment you spend any amount of time thinking about it, it falls apart. It's like trying to ban the Ship of Theseus from a club.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 day ago (22 children)

Oh please yes

Put a 100% stop to advertising but also marketing altogether.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pretty dumb article if you spend more than a second thinking about this issue.

The entire historical premise that we "didn't have ads" is so fucking incorrect and reeks of appeal to nature. Yeah we didn't have tv ads but we had monarchs and elite that played the same role. How is paying of some sleezy high up salesman is different from a Google search ad? If anything the latter is more ethically apt.

I'd take democracy with ads over whatever the fuck that alternative timeline that polices "unpaid word of mouth"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago

I'm just going to take this opportunity to remind everyone that you can and should donate to your Mastodon and Lemmy instances, even if it's just $5 a month. That's how we band together to keep these platforms ad-free, and I don't know about you all, but I love that my mind isn't being manipulated here.

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

what if we made capitalism illegal? because all of the bullshit like advertising is symptomatic. the root cause is capitalism. western civilization has to be reset entirely. and it will never get done through protesting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 265 points 2 days ago (18 children)

The web has been cleaned with uBlock Origin. Doing that IRL would be great. And for every stupid counter argument (I've seen those on HackerNews), I don't tolerate brain washing.

The most stupid argument I've seen is from an American who said "what if you don't know about the effects of a drug that could save your life?" Well, that's the job of the doctor. Your society has failed if you rely on marketing to eat random chemical dangerous stuff.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] eugenia@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

No, advertising is useful to small businesses and big. What needs to happen, is actual thoughtful regulation, as with everything else.

[–] opsecisbasedonwhat@lemmy.ca 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It's necessary for monopoly capitalism to induce demand. It's part of the planned economy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 145 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (27 children)

It's also a form free market distortion that actual economic conservatives should hate.

Rather than having firms compete for who can make the best product or service, advertising instead lets them compete based on who can best psychologically manipulate the population en masse.

It's a "rich get richer" mechanic that any halfway competent dev would've patched out for balance reasons a long time ago.

load more comments (27 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›