this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
1228 points (96.3% liked)

Memes

49468 readers
1454 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (10 children)

Even the more devout Christians I know (who actually have opinions about different theological positions) believe Earth and human society should not be modeled on heaven and attempts to do so will fail due to humans being inherently / essentially Fallen. This is part of how they rationalize their resistance / apathy towards movements for justice, at the very least they believe it is futile to seek justice in this life.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is part of how they rationalize their resistance / apathy towards movements for justice, at the very least they believe it is futile to seek justice in this life.

Sounds like bullshit an unjust leader would feed them.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 4 days ago

It is religion ...

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 20 points 4 days ago

Shoutout to my boy Camilo Torres who famously said, "If Jesus was alive today he'd be a guerrillero."

[–] Future_Honkey@hexbear.net 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Is the 0 getting around a commie filter or?

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's 0 because communism is a moneyless system

[–] Future_Honkey@hexbear.net 14 points 4 days ago

Shit i have got to read more the0ry

[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 14 points 4 days ago
[–] mathemachristian@hexbear.net 8 points 4 days ago

difference is that in heaven people dont have need to produce, so presumably no means of production even exist

[–] ClathrateG@hexbear.net 9 points 4 days ago

Ooh, baby, do you know what that's worth?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›