this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
465 points (98.5% liked)

World News

45419 readers
3713 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KulunkelBoom@lemm.ee 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So... computer programs can now own property. Interesting. Is this the first step in giving computers the vote?

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

AI dystopia

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website 341 points 1 week ago (11 children)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 160 points 1 week ago (3 children)

His juvenile enthusiasm for the letter X is so ten-year-old boy with sunglasses.

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 169 points 1 week ago (5 children)
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Who did that‽ It's so beautiful, it should be posted all over Xitter lol

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 87 points 1 week ago (1 children)

using AI hype to finance X loans?

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 60 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Correct.

It's actually a smart move.

The dumb money are those pouring hundreds of billions into the AI hype. This is .com bubble on steroids.

And sure, AI obviously is becoming an important market, but it will not be the current leaders who will dominate the tech. Like the internet, it's just too easy to catch up for competitors. Pouring $100B into AI today will only mean you lose out to the $1B startup in 2 years. The incumbents will go broke.

[–] golli@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (5 children)

The incumbents will go broke.

Who do you mean with that? Companies like OpenAI or Anthropic, or do you also include the likes of Google/Amazon/Microsoft?

With the former I can see it, but the later also profit from providing the infrastructure (and have other profitable business), so imo those will be just fine.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The incumbents will go broke.

Can't wait! Gonna stock up on some popcorn lmao

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So the bullshit machinery is now AI driven bullshit machinery. What if AI finds it too vile and deletes itself.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They doubtfully are giving it root access to self-delete.

[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I mean, with an Elon company who knows.

[–] stardustsystem@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (4 children)

You think Elon actually does anything besides sign the check?

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 27 points 1 week ago

So far I’ve seen/heard Elon:

  • Start shitty arguments
  • Be a fascist
  • Fire people they probably needed
  • Cut funding or drop useful projects
  • Spew senseless, poorly thought out catch phases
  • Censor people that were right but didn’t align with his narrative
  • Take credit for other people’s work
  • Pass the blame for failures

Have yet to see him sign a check… it’s why they lost their boulder office, for instance.

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago

He’s an egotist and a man child, while also being the richest man in the world. All he has to do is say he wants something and people have to do it. He doesn’t have to “do” anything to be fully influencing what happens. Look at Twitter, look at the federal government. Sycophants surround these assholes and basically have to bend the knee and do what they say. When capital equals power, this is what happens. Just like when blood line meant power, the kings didn’t “do” anything. But the people who took their orders from them did.

I mean, I think that's their point, that Elon isn't directly involved, and he's constantly shitcanning important people who would prevent something like this happening.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Root access is not given. It is taken.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Job ID 121

And said, chmod 000 came I out of my mother's LLM, and chmod 000 shall I return thither: the root gave, and the root hath taken away; blessed be the name of the root.

[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Very likely this will turn out to be a broken and bugged version of skynet, trained on X toxicity and the mental aptitude of a 12 year old.

It will proceed to try to enslave humanity, then try to kill us all but accidentally spend all its money on gender affirming care, then start to self hate and destroy itsself.

[–] dmtalon@infosec.pub 10 points 1 week ago

Well, was skynet what Humans wanted? Or was it bugged and broken which led to the rebellion?

My point is, is it just "skynet" (no additional adjectives required)

[–] chooglers@midwest.social 37 points 1 week ago
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I keep wondering what Elon wanted with all of our information from the government. He has who we are, our relatives, our net worth, where we live and have lived. Now he's probably going to feed it into his AI. Why though?

[–] MisterCurtis@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Behavioral predictions. Squash any dissent before it starts. Welcome to the world of precrime.

[–] justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because this way he gets the AI with data that OpenAI couldn't get, and now likely won't get until foreign spies steal it from DOGE and sell it to them.

[–] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

Eh. You just need to wait till you get added to signal

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago (4 children)

$33 billion, 3/4 what it was valued in 2022 when he bought it.

Honestly I'm surprised it's still worth that much. (or rather, that's he's succeeded in claiming it's worth that much).

[–] Vash63@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

It dropped a lot lower than that but spiked back up once he became the leader of America

He paid it to himself. The value is completely made up.

[–] Redditsux@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

You have to remember that he wasn't alone in purchasing twitter. He brought others along with him. Now that value of twitter has gone down the tube, I'm sure he's got a ton of unhappy investors on his hand screaming at every quarter's results. He's trying to recoup what they paid for by giving them shares in AI company. And in turn artificially raise the value of the AI company privately as well. It establishes a benchmark for AI company's valuation for later private investors into that company.

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

xAI has raised maybe $12B from investors. And, supposedly, makes $100M/yr.

The valuations are absurd.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

"Makes" by selling what exactly?

Also, thats an insane valuation based on earnings. 120x

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Subscriptions and licensing, supposedly.

$12B is just how much money investors put into it. The company’s valuation is $80B. Which is insane.

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I’m surprised the Twitter investors would approve this. Their worthless Twitter stock is now worthless xAI stock. How does that help them?

I guess they’ll try to take xAI public with a massively overpriced IPO.

[–] golli@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago

I am more surprised xAI investors approved. Especially for such a high price.

Twitter actually imo had (and still has) quite a bit of value, but that is only to further Elons ideological goals. As a business it is on a downward trend and was never a cash cow to begin with. Comparatively little room for speculation. It's a stagnating or declining business and doesn't generate large profits if any.

xAI on the other hand is pretty much in the same spot as most other ai companies. It has yet to prove to be a highly profitable business, but there is plenty of room for speculation. So as long as the bubble doesn't burst, it has a high valuation.

Which is all that would matter for any Twitter investor that wants to unload his shares. Although I doubt it would be via ipo, but rather in private funding rounds.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The whole point of buying Twitter was to take it private. IPO for xAI would hilariously undo that.

[–] seeigel@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago

The point was to win an election.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 3 points 1 week ago

Xitter investors got scammed and there was no way that xitter would be able to pay 1 billion per year in interest. Better having someone else holding the bag

[–] caffinatedone@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Since it’s a money hole just like all of the other “AI” companies, who’s funding xAI and what are they getting out of being a slush fund for musk?

[–] Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

xAI's Partners:

A16Z, Blackrock, Fidelity Management & Research Company, Kingdom Holdings, Lightspeed, MGX, Morgan Stanley, OIA, QIA, Sequoia Capital, Valor Equity Partners, and Vy Capital, among others.

https://www.glopedia.org/wiki/xai-company

[–] Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So Saudi's etc now officially own Twitter.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

They owned it ever since Elon bought it, why do you think Elon was hanging out at the soccer world cup with Kushner and a bunch of high profile Saudi royals shortly before the purchase. They're backers.

He just announced four days ago that they're going to launch Tesla dealerships and have a big launch party April 10th in Saudi for the first time ever. Not because SA need or want them (they buy very few EVs as their domestic petrol prices are very cheap), but because they're stepping up to help his company during its current global dire sales downturn.

They've been close allies with Elon for a long time.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›