this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1651 points (96.7% liked)

Science Memes

13349 readers
3691 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] missandry351@lemmings.world 9 points 13 hours ago

People who see gender as a F or M binary in 2025 are willingly ignorant to the bone.

[–] RumorsOfLove@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Critically thinking now, how strong is the evidence here?

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

A person’s biological sex usually refers to their status as female or male depending on their chromosomes, reproductive organs, and other characteristics. Chromosomes are tightly packed DNA, or molecules that contain the genetic instructions for the development and functioning of all living things. Humans typically have forty-six chromosomes. Two of those are sex chromosomes that contain instructions for the development and functioning of characteristics related to biological sex, such as reproductive organs. There are two kinds of human sex chromosomes, X and Y. Individuals identified as males tend to have one X and one Y chromosome, while those identified as females tend to have two X chromosomes. However, other people are born with other chromosome combinations, such as XXY, that lead them to develop a mix of characteristics. People who fit that description are often referred to as intersex, a category for people whose bodies do not conform with stereotypical expectations of males or females at birth.

Taken from here

Evidence seems pretty strong to me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] holdstrong@lemm.ee 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“It’s basic biology” mfs when advanced biology

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it is basic biology, ie biology simplified to teach a kid in middle school. the thing is sciences don't stop at middle school level. a lot of university education is about clarifying that things you learned before were simplified to the point that they're practically useless if not outright wrong.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Light travels in straight lines, next year its a wave and then its particles. What you said isso true about uni rethreading.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

To be fair light does travel in straight lines (more or less... ignoring that nothing travels in any set or even single path something something veritasium video), its not lights fault if a straight line in physical reality doesn't always happen to match up with the geometry we invented.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

See I didnt go that far, mindboggling

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EnthusiasticNature94@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I agree with Dr. Jey McCreight on the science.

But for determining truth, both sides are wrong here.

Dunning-Kruger is bad, but so is credentialism and appeal to authority.

Many people with PhD's have had Dunning-Kruger. Someone else mentioned Ben Carson being great at neurosurgery, but not politics.

A PhD doesn't make you infallible.

I am saying this as someone who is taking graduate-level courses and will be pursuing my PhD. When I'm correct, it's not because my future PhD causes reality to magically conform to my opinions - it's because I rigorously looked at the evidence, logic, and formed my own conclusion that better aligns with reality.

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You can even be incorrect on a subject you have expertise in.

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

that's why we have peer reviews for new findings by experts.

load more comments (1 replies)

Experts often disagree.

If it were that easy, everything would be solved. We wouldn't need so much research or so many universities.

[–] Lumbardo@reddthat.com 1 points 16 hours ago

If one hasn't fallen victim to Dunning-Kruger, then they have not advanced their knowledge in any meaningful capacity.

[–] nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The phrase is funny but you wouldn't catch me dead wearing a logical fallacy

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can I interest you in a logical phallus?

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 3 points 13 hours ago

Wouldn't that be a logic probe?

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

....and all in between, hormonal and/or physically. "Only two genders" is false

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 63 points 1 day ago (6 children)

To be fair, a Person with a PhD still can have Dunning-Kruger on other subjects.

Ben Carson is a great Neurosurgeon, but dumbass on politics.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›