this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
95 points (89.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

31134 readers
1193 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted, clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts: 1

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
    • If you feel strongly that you want politics back, please volunteer as a mod.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's almost as if capitalist billionaire sports team owners in the US believe that doing everything possible to ensure all parties have equal chances at success is worthwhile and benefits the whole system, and conversely, that allowing completely unrestrained economic competition would lead to ruin. πŸ€”

Revenue sharing

Revenue sharing is a business tool used by North American professional sports leagues to redistribute revenues from wealthy large-market clubs to less wealthy small-market clubs.

Salary caps

In professional sports, a salary cap (or wage cap) is an agreement or rule that places a limit on the amount of money that a team can spend on players' salaries. It exists as a per-player limit or a total limit for the team's roster, or both.

Drafts

A draft is a process used in some countries (especially in North America) and sports (especially in closed leagues) to allocate certain players to teams. In a draft, teams take turns selecting from a pool of eligible players.

To encourage parity, teams that do poorly in the previous season usually get to choose first in the postseason draft, sometimes with a "lottery" factor in an attempt to discourage teams from tanking.

NO promotion or relegation

Promotion and relegation is used by sports leagues as a process where teams can move up and down among divisions in a league system, based on their performance over a season.

An alternate system of league organization, used primarily in Australia, Canada, Singapore, and the United States, is a closed model based on licensing or franchises. This maintains the same teams from year to year, with occasional admission of expansion teams and relocation of existing teams, and with no team movement between the major league and minor leagues.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] he_is_matt@lemmy.world 47 points 3 days ago (4 children)

You forget having the working man funding these dream stadiums with their taxes, then also charging insane amounts to attend the games, so that all those things up there can continue to happen.

[–] turtle@lemm.ee 9 points 3 days ago

Good point!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You, a socialist: "Please, I'm begging you, sports should be a municipal amenity not a profit driven cash grab."

Me, an American Capitalist: "And then they made me pay for parking! And then I had to give Ticketmaster an extra 12% on top of the entrance price! And then half the stadium was just 20' advertisement billboards! And it's all going into the pockets of a dozen extremely rich oligarchs, most of whom don't even live here!!! JUST LIKE COMMUNIST RUSSIA!"

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

And then there is the massive tax breaks the stadiums are given so the is even less returning to the city's coffers.

[–] ChillPenguin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I can't believe I paid for US Bank Stadium when I was living downtown Minneapolis. Fucking criminal.

[–] farcaster@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"The problem is that we all too often have socialism for the rich and rugged free enterprise capitalism for the poor. That’s the problem."

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

[–] turtle@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yes, thank you, that's the quote I had in mind!

[–] platypode@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Professional athletes also have some of the strongest unions in the country, since they’re a small group of practically irreplaceable workers, and many of the league structures are the result of collective bargaining between played and owners.

[–] turtle@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago

Good point!

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's not socialism, it's market regulation to promote fair play and prevent unstoppable juggernauts from forming.

It's literally just enlightened self interest applied to capitalism, and the very idea shatters the "minds" of MBAs the world over.

A socialist pro league would be a league owned by the players, staff, and arena workers.

[–] turtle@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

Sure, I agree with that, but I didn't say they were socialist sports leagues, only that that they had "socialistic policies". Perhaps if I had written '"socialistic" concepts' it would have been a bit more clear.

[–] Dungrad@feddit.org 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This system is great and should be applied everywhere. And by everywhere I mean European football (soccer).

[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think we have different definitions of β€œeverywhere”.

[–] Dungrad@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago

Yeah sorry, I was thinking in terms of "sport".

[–] turtle@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

Absolutely! It should also be applied to society in the US and everywhere.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

USA!!! Bread and Circuses.

WITHOUT BREAD!!!

Circus subscriptions just went up again.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 4 points 2 days ago

Parasitic owner class was able to get stupid pedons to accept the bonds under municipal name and increases taxes....

If idiots gonna accept being fleeced, why shouldn't owners of sports team exploit them for profit?

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is also true of large corporations in general, in the US. Tax breaks, loopholes, and similar everywhere -- if you're rich enough. Privatized profits, but socialized losses.

[–] turtle@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

Absolutely! Those corporations also love hobbling or getting rid of any honest competition through mergers, acquisitions, regulatory capture, non-compete agreements, and endless other mechanisms.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nothing gets you guaranteed hero worship and respect like being able to throw or kick a ball or similar in the US. The economics around it are unsurprisingly huge and complex, as everyone tries to be sure they get their piece.

Wait until you hear about how you cannot pay to watch all the NFL/NBA/MLB/NHL games in your market on a streaming service. Unless something has very recently changed, there's no method of legitimately paying where you won't still experience blackouts.

[–] turtle@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wait until you hear about how you cannot pay to watch all the NFL/NBA/MLB/NHL games in your market on a streaming service. Unless something has very recently changed, there’s no method of legitimately paying where you won’t still experience blackouts.

Yikes, I hadn't even thought of that! There are some local games where the only way to watch if you live in that city is to buy a ticket to go to the stadium, right?

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I can't say for sure. I think in at least some cases the blackouts are to support local cable tv, which we no longer subscribe to. I don't think there tend to be games that can be watched only in person, but it's possible I just don't know.

[–] turtle@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

I don't watch sports much, but I think I've heard multiple times of certain games being played locally not being available at all on TV due to black outs. I could be wrong though.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Another hypocritical dichotomy is:

Central planning does not and cannot work as efficiently as the free market!

Meanwhile, Amazon and Walmart are literally centrally planned economic production/purchase/distribution systems for nearly every kind of good imaginable, which both benefit massively from government subsidies, but they don't count because... they're corporations, and they don't have perfect monopolies.

... Even though in almost every example given of a 'centrally planned economy', the state also did not have a perfect monopoly.

[–] PapaSkwat@lemy.lol 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You should check out the military. It's downright communism with a thick coat of red/white/blue paint.

[–] turtle@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

That's a lot more understandable and less controversial though. I don't think you could properly operate a military force without having a level playing field for everyone.

Come to think about it, it's almost like no complex system involving humans is bound to work well without having a level playing field for everyone. πŸ€”