this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
511 points (95.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

31160 readers
601 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted, clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts: 1

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
    • If you feel strongly that you want politics back, please volunteer as a mod.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yarr@feddit.nl 31 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Completely agree! The entire adult content platform has become nothing more than a monetization machine for platforms like OnlyFans. GoneWild was once about people expressing themselves and sharing their art without the pressure of making a quick buck. Now it's all about selling subscriptions and getting clicks. The whole industry has been ruined by commercial interests prioritizing profit over passion and community. Same thing with Patreon, where creators are expected to churn out content just to keep their fans engaged rather than doing what they actually love. And don't even get me started on the algorithm-driven news feeds that suck the soul out of social media. Commercialization has absolutely destroyed the integrity and creativity of online platforms. We're losing the very things that made them worth using in the first place.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EsmereldaFritzmonster@lemmings.world 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Fish gotta swim, birds gotta eat

[–] SOB_Van_Owen@lemm.ee 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Tiger got to hunt

Bird got to fly

Man got to ask himself "why, why, why"

Tiger got to sleep

Bird got to land

Man got to tell himself he understand

[–] answersplease77@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago (2 children)

now it's just flashing genatils not even a face is attached to the body

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 36 points 6 days ago (2 children)

not even a face is attached to the body

Posting pictures of your face on clear net is stupid in 2025.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

how is it different than walking around with your face uncovered in 2025

[–] 8000gnat@reddthat.com 10 points 6 days ago

genitals are simultaneously visible. hope this helps.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

fidelity of the data and certainty in identification of the subject

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Care to elaborate? I'm not seeing whatever it is I'm meant to see that says it's meaningfully different.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 4 points 6 days ago (4 children)

you suggested that walking in the public street is the same as uploading photo into clear net...

i clarified that 1) quality of upload will be higher and 2) ID ability of current system is spotty

by uploading photos on faceberg you are training the current spotty systtem for ID into a better ID system.

TLDR. uploading high quality photos into social media under your name is not the same as walking down the street while having surveillance cameras take pictures of you.

[–] mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago

I think they mean: how is you looking at my naked body and face MY problem?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] answersplease77@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

It's called GoneWild not Omegle to hide your face and flash your junk

[–] frezik@midwest.social 20 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It was always that, partially because people didn't want their livelihood affected by having nudes on the Internet. With the rise of an option where having nudes on the Internet can be their livelihood, there's more faces in those pictures.

The better option would be for people to feel free to express themselves this way without worrying about their livelihood.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

As someone who likes sex and to some degree exhibitionism:

Any amount of sex liking/photos of yourself online will bar you from certain jobs. I have a rather traumatic history of sex work - even the fact that I did it to survive is something that tars me. Doing things consensually and willingly is even worse.

The trade off for some is going to be financial. If having videos of yourself online could potentially ruin any change of a normal life - there needs to be something that secures some safety in return.

Being promiscuous is considered a character flaw. If you are frequently willing - the times where you are not have zero chance of being tried fairly in the court of public opinion.

The Madonna/whore complex fucks everyone over. Having lots of sex is fun, we’ve just come up with this dickish social rule system where enjoying receptive sex is a strongly ingrained societal “no no.”

[–] Lazylazycat@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Actually, when GW was formed, one of the rules was that you HAD to include your face. Different times though, I'm glad that obviously isn't the case now.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The worst part about browsing GW back then was how hard it was to get the onion off your belt.

But those were the days...

[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 3 points 5 days ago

It was the style at the time

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I would prefer it that way if it meant they were all professional and ensure proper age vetting, but it seems like even that is lost.

load more comments
view more: next ›