this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2024
187 points (91.9% liked)

World News

39096 readers
2268 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

When China’s BYD recently overtook Elon Musk’s Tesla as the global leader in sales of electric vehicles, casual observers of the auto industry might have been surprised.

But what’s caught other carmakers around the world off-guard is something else about BYD, which is backed by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway: its low prices.

“No one can match BYD on price. Period,” Michael Dunne, CEO of Asia-focused car consultancy Dunne Insights, told the Financial Times. “Boardrooms in America, Europe, Korea and Japan are in a state of shock.”

BYD can keeps its costs low in part because it owns the entire supply chain of its EV batteries, from the raw materials to the finished battery packs. That matters because a battery accounts for about 40% of a new electric vehicle’s price.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 80 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

Of course nobody can match BYD, they don’t just own the supply chain the Chinese government subsidizes every part in their supply chain. The Chinese government wants to crush foreign competitors. And before you say that Tesla gets subsidies, it’s no where near as extensive as the subsidies Chinese EV manufacturers get.

[–] nekandro@lemmy.ml 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

China doesn't need to subsidize the entire supply chain because the reason Chinese EVs are so cheap is literally hyper-capitalism. China has had an immensely competitive EV market for years, and they're been getting into price wars without government intervention. That's forced innovation at a pace that Tesla cannot match alone because they have no need to compete at such a pace. Here's a list of national EV subsidies and their status:

  1. In 2022, the 12600RMB consumer incentive to buy a BEV vehicle was ended. This is rather similar to Biden's EV tax credit.

  2. China has waived the consumption tax for the EV market, which is a tax designed to target environmentally-unfriendly products. The consumption tax is commonly applied to automobiles, but they're being explicitly waived for the EV market for what is hopefully an obvious reason.

  3. Currently, the tax-free allowance for an EV (the portion of an EV purchase that is not charged VAT) is 30000RMB (@13% VAT, = 3900RMB). This subsidy is being reduced in 2025 and phased out entirely in 2027. This is also rather similar to Biden's EV tax credit.

  4. Costs of EV charging/battery switching on the grid are borne by the government because the government manages electricity on the supply-side, including finding producers and managing distribution. This is not unusual of crown corporations in other countries.

While there are provincial incentives for companies to set up shop in one province over another, they're smaller scale, not received support at the national level, and not unique to China (see: subsidies to Tesla for their production and to Amazon for their HQ2). The most unique element of China's subsidy regime is the elimination of excess consumption tax in the EV market, which has created a huge marginal advantage for developing EVs over developing ICE automobiles. Importantly, that subsidy is simply reducing the excess tax charged on automobile manufacturing over that charged on typical consumption.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Subsidiaries enabling a more rapid transition away from fossil fuels by lowering the cost to consumers is a great thing, and what's even more impressive is they're also using subsidized projects to install high-speed or low cost rail lines all over the world.

It's great that there's a country working so hard to help is turn the corner on climate change especially as they're focusing on making life better for the working classes. The country has lots of problems but we all do, they're also doing great things which I think we could learn a lot from them.

[–] Adanisi@lemmy.zip 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

A lot of people are saying this is bad, but for once, I'm on China's side here.

The faster we pivot away from fossil fuels, the better, by any means necessary.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GenEcon@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago (4 children)

And don't underestimate, that Human Right Violations are a competitive advantage, too. You don't even need to argue with slave labor from Uygurs, but not allowing unions and having really low labour standards brings the costs down.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

What does the government subsidy per vehicle work out to?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 57 points 10 months ago (17 children)

Uh... yeah? China beats nearly everyone on price but you don't go there for quality and durability.

[–] Jode@midwest.social 87 points 10 months ago (4 children)

The American car companies haven't exactly been stellar with regards to quality, reliability, and safety lately either.

[–] vivavideri@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago
[–] Vash63@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

My VW-built EV seems pretty high quality. China and USA aren't the only game in EVs.

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Get Yourself an European car???? That's where you go for quality

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 22 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Then get yourself a Japanese car. That's where you go for reliability.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

Depends on the make and model.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 40 points 10 months ago

As if Tesla was famous for its quality and durability either.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago (23 children)

That view is unfortunately out of date. Many Chinese products are of equal or superior quality to their global counterparts. Think Lenovo laptops and OnePlus smartphones. Chinese stuff can be cheap and high quality.

[–] Shyfer@ttrpg.network 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Then it's got to be what the person below said: beating the hell out of their workers, poor conditions and benefits, stuff like that.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

You are one hundred per cent correct. There're a million things you can criticise Chinese manufacturing for but universally poor quality isn't one of them

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pycorax@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Lenovo has lost all sense of reputation for me after the whole superfish fiasco.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] MonsterMonster@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's what the British car industry said in the 60s and 70s about Japanese cars. Everyone bad mouthed anything made in Japan as being poor quality.

The Japanese succeeded through good products and their domestic rivals (in Britain) being arrogant, xenophobic and letting standards slide thinking they were great and couldn't be beaten.

I've a Japanese Honda CRV (ironically built in UK) and a Chinese built MG5 EV. The EV is best built car I've owned in 35 years.

Many established car brands are going to disappear Tesla, I believe, being one.

[–] mwalimu@baraza.africa 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I once read that the failure of British industrial policy to engage labour as a long term competitive edge instead of a dispensable short term concern saw Germany overtake British car makers. Germany dealt with labour strikes more comprehensively by engaging labour in policy structures. Like including Labour representatives in boardrooms.

I wonder how this may reflect on Chinese / Western competitiveness.

Found the piece: https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-23406467

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

I wonder how this may reflect on Chinese / Western competitiveness.

Sounds like it's almost a 1:1 copy of what happened with the Brits.

For whatever reason, English speakers are easily-duped into thinking non-English speakers can't compete.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They produce a lot of quality and durable products in China. Apple and Tesla are both producing there, as do many thousands of other companies.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tomatopathe@sh.itjust.works 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Your iPhone / Samsung is manufactured there. So no, that's a bad take. You get what you pay for, and good quality is still cheaper than made elsewhere.

[–] pycorax@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Samsung is slowly moving some production from China though. For instance, my phone is manufactured in Vietnam instead.

[–] Sl00k@programming.dev 8 points 10 months ago

That doesn't say much about the build quality though as the reason companies are moving out of China is Chinas increased manufacturing costs.

[–] Vash63@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Samsung isn't building their phones in South Korea anymore?

[–] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The BYD cars they sell in the West are pretty decently build. I’d be more worried about the aftersales services. Chinese electronics companies always have shitty customer service. Like Lenovo and Huawei. And since a car always needs some repairs during its lifetime I will never buy an EV from a Chinese brand unless they have proven to have good aftersales service.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (3 children)

You gotta be a special kind of innocent to think Americans make quality automobiles.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] set_secret@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

furiously typed into their Chinese Assembled IPhone....

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not to mention: I’ll eat my hat if the CCP isn’t providing some sort of subsidization, for no other reason than the fact that it’s a national pride thing for them

[–] Augustiner@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

Most carmakers get heavily subsidized. All the German ones for example. It’s a big industry and states like to keep their brands competitive.

[–] jose1324@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

BYD is better quality than the shit Stellantis puts out

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Fedop@slrpnk.net 17 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Is this another case of subsidizing the product to sell the data? Information over each individuals driving habits, audio from the car, connection to the phone. Could be valuable to the CCP.

https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/blog/privacy-nightmare-on-wheels-every-car-brand-reviewed-by-mozilla-including-ford-volkswagen-and-toyota-flunks-privacy-test/

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (21 children)

Are these even street legal in the US? Our safety standards are obscene. Air bags alone cost 5k.

It's why Tata never released a vehicle here.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 9 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


When China’s BYD recently overtook Elon Musk’s Tesla as the global leader in sales of electric vehicles, casual observers of the auto industry might have been surprised.

But what’s caught other carmakers around the world off-guard is something else about BYD, which is backed by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway: its low prices.

While BYD cars are not yet a common sight on American roads, many experts believe it’s only a matter of time, despite the high tariffs that help keep them at bay for now.

But BYD is planning to export much cheaper models to markets around the world, including Europe, South America, and Southeast Asia.

In November, House lawmakers warned about Chinese giants like BYD “gaining a back door to the U.S. market” through the southern neighbor.

BYD also has the advantage of its founder and CEO Wang Chuanfu, a relentless cost-cutter whom the late Charlie Munger—Buffett’s long-time partner at Berkshire—described in one of this final interviews last year.


The original article contains 556 words, the summary contains 160 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] chitak166@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is why Americans hate China. It's legitimate competition for them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›