this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
349 points (97.8% liked)

Games

17077 readers
598 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] proceduralnightshade@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Horizontally I'm fine with how big games are. They should grow vertically, and I wouldn't mind 6 times the depth.

What do I mean by that? I have no idea. Maybe you people have

[–] syklemil@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago

I'd interpret vertical content growth as content per area, deep story lines, stuff like that. It's a common enough comment, see e.g. MMO players complaining about "content drought".

[–] sexual_tomato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A cyberpunk game that takes place entirely in a replica of the Kowloon walled city would be cool as fuck. Just as much map "area" as fallout 4 but packed into a 1 mile cube.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] immediate_winter@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I was nodding along in agreement but now that you mention it I also didn't really know what you were saying

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

I actually might like a game that big... If it were actually a game that big. Starfield is a perfect example of pointlessly big but full of nothing. A game with the depth and complexity of some of the best cities in Bethesda games but EVERYWHERE instead of just a few select cities with barren wastes in between like a real world has might be incredible and be the last game I play for the rest of my life.

But that's not currently possible and all we can do right now is the fake BS where everything is empty but the map is BIG.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Counterpoint. Mordor II.

[–] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's not an open world, but Mirror's Edge is a great game.

[–] TwanHE@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wasn't the second game open world tho? But that might be the reason it lost its charm for me.

[–] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Yes, it was. But EA ruined it with their launcher, so you can't play it on Linux.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 day ago

The biggness doesn't matter as much as how much there is to do in a meaningful and rewarding way.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›